Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Received: from [64.45.223.201] (account <marv@lancaironline.net>)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.1b3)
  with HTTP id 2123219 for <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>; Tue, 15 Apr 2003 05:33:32 -0400
From: "Marvin Kaye" <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Lycoming style engine mount accessory cover
To: flyrotary
X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro WebUser Interface v.4.1b3
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 05:33:32 -0400
Message-ID: <web-2123219@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <001901c30322$b7fb0a80$f2694e51@bobbyJo>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Posted for "Clive  Clapham" <mail@clapham55.fsnet.co.uk>:

> Ahh! That should work fine Clive but I would think the direct drive market
> would be limited and make it difficult to justify the development costs.
> But I enjoy seeing these ideas developed.  Best of luck with it.

I came to the same conclusion.  I think I am going to make a steel Lycoming
style mout just for my own oroject and take it from there.  As a sand cast
mount would be heavier anyway.  By the way I noticed that your 1/4 scale
darwings in your engine manual are way off 1/4 scale are you aware?

On the stock crank sensor how many pulses per revolution?

Clive