Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Received: from [65.33.166.167] (account <marv@lancaironline.net>)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro WebUser 4.0b8)
  with HTTP id 1796844 for <flyrotary@lancaironline.net>; Thu, 03 Oct 2002 08:58:45 -0400
From: "Marvin Kaye" <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] dynamic balancing
To: flyrotary
X-Mailer: CommuniGate Pro Web Mailer v.4.0b8
Date: Thu, 03 Oct 2002 08:58:45 -0400
Message-ID: <web-1796844@logan.com>
In-Reply-To: <003d01c26adb$d87abe20$1702a8c0@WorkGroup>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit

Posted for "Ed Anderson" <eanderson@carolina.rr.com>:

> To those of you who have built up your
> engines already (or have purchased an engine from Bruce or another
> builder), did you or your builder take this step before final assembly, or
> did you simply put everything back together and trust in faith that the
> spinning masses will be harmonious in their inter-relationships?  All
> comments welcome and appreciated.

I've never had the two engines I built balanced.  just made certain I had
the correct counter weights for the rotors being used and it seemed to run
smoothly.  But, then compared to a reciprocating engine it would probably
seem smooth even if it were out of balance.

Ed Anderson