Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: flyrotary Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 01:10:41 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [65.54.169.148] (HELO hotmail.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1b1) with ESMTP id 2084478 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Mon, 24 Mar 2003 00:53:37 -0500 Received: from mail pickup service by hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC; Sun, 23 Mar 2003 21:53:36 -0800 Received: from 67.243.12.115 by bay3-dav118.bay3.hotmail.com with DAV; Mon, 24 Mar 2003 05:53:36 +0000 X-Originating-IP: [67.243.12.115] X-Originating-Email: [lors01@msn.com] Reply-To: "Tracy Crook" From: "Tracy Crook" X-Original-To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: Re: [FlyRotary] Re: Sump tank X-Original-Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2003 00:52:55 -0500 Organization: Real World Solutions Inc. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 X-Original-Message-ID: X-OriginalArrivalTime: 24 Mar 2003 05:53:36.0844 (UTC) FILETIME=[B64438C0:01C2F1C9] > Subject: [FlyRotary] Re: Sump tank > > > > Posted for "Tommy James" : > > > > Hi Paul, > > To me this would be a question of temperature and pressure. If the fuel > can > > cool down in the sump that would be better than running all the way back > to > > a tank. > > What happens, pressure wise, when the 2 gallon sump fills up? Actually, I > > don't think it would be a problem, but an item to consider any way. > > The surest way is to run the overflow back to a main tank. Why did you > > choose a 2 gallon sump? > > Regards, > > Tommy James<>< > > > Hi, Tommy....thanks for the reply. I chose the 2 gallon sump tank because > Velocity uses it in their retract aircraft, and it will fit behind my rear > seat back and just forward of the main gear. Not much room there for a > larger sump tank. I am also toying with the idea of not using a sump tank > at all, and just having the fuel return to the left main tank, which I will > make my "primary" tank for takeoff and landing etc. Paul Conner > > >> Homepage: http://www.flyrotary.com/ Now you're talk'n. I hate sump tanks. The only advantage to having one is to eliminate having to install a fuel return line to the main tank. Not a good enough reason. But don't even think about running off the right tank while returning fuel to the left. It is a fuel management nightmare. Just feed from the left all the time and transfer fuel from right to left with a small facit fuel pump. Throw away your fuel selector valve. Tracy Crook