Return-Path: Sender: (Marvin Kaye) To: flyrotary Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 01:19:21 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from sccrmhc01.attbi.com ([204.127.202.61] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1b1) with ESMTP id 2081960 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Fri, 21 Mar 2003 01:08:51 -0500 Received: from rv8 (12-231-190-29.client.attbi.com[12.231.190.29]) by sccrmhc01.attbi.com (sccrmhc01) with SMTP id <2003032106085000100cukmhe>; Fri, 21 Mar 2003 06:08:50 +0000 X-Original-Message-ID: <238d01c2ef70$0c455080$1dbee70c@rv8> From: "kevin lane" X-Original-To: "Rotary motors in aircraft" References: Subject: there may be some method to Tracy's madness :-) X-Original-Date: Thu, 20 Mar 2003 22:00:30 -0800 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106 check this report out. it may make you wonder if Tracy is actually on to something when he recommends the thicker radiators. there is no date on the report, but it appears to have been written quite some time ago. I only wish the drawings were better. it points out how auto radiators are lousy for aircraft because of the higher air speeds. kevin "Properties of Special Types of Radiators" http://naca.larc.nasa.gov/reports/1921/naca-report-86/index.cgi?page09.gif