Return-Path: <13brv3@bellsouth.net> Received: from imf16aec.mail.bellsouth.net ([205.152.59.64] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.2b8) with ESMTP id 336076 for flyrotary@lancaironline.net; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 13:51:54 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.152.59.64; envelope-from=13brv3@bellsouth.net Received: from rd ([65.6.194.9]) by imf16aec.mail.bellsouth.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.08 201-253-122-130-108-20031117) with ESMTP id <20040727175122.TOBC1721.imf16aec.mail.bellsouth.net@rd> for ; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 13:51:22 -0400 From: "Russell Duffy" <13brv3@bellsouth.net> To: "'Rotary motors in aircraft'" Subject: RE: [FlyRotary] EM-2 Accuracy of RPM Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 12:51:32 -0500 Message-ID: <007901c47402$5a634bb0$6101a8c0@rd> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_007A_01C473D8.718D43B0" X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.6626 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1409 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_007A_01C473D8.718D43B0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Has anyone actually verified the rpm readings from the EM-2? I have no particular reason to question it, but it would be good to know that the EM-2 readings are accurate within some factor. Mark S. Hi Mark, I'm assuming that you also have an EC-2. If that's the case, I'm pretty sure the EM-2 is getting it's RPM data from the EC-2. If the EC-2 doesn't know the exact RPM of the engine, we're all in trouble :-) Seriously, I never questioned it for a second, but you can call Tracy and see if there's any way it could be wrong. Cheers, Rusty ------=_NextPart_000_007A_01C473D8.718D43B0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message

Has anyone actually verified the rpm readings from=20 the
EM-2?  I have no particular reason to question it, but it = would be=20 good to
know that the EM-2 readings are accurate within some=20 factor.

Mark S.

Hi = Mark,

I'm = assuming that you also=20 have an EC-2.  If that's the case, I'm pretty sure the EM-2 is = getting it's=20 RPM data from the EC-2.  If the EC-2 doesn't know the exact RPM of = the=20 engine, we're all in trouble :-)   

Seriously, = I=20 never questioned it for a second, but you can call Tracy and=20 see if there's any way it could be=20 wrong.   

Cheers,
Rusty
------=_NextPart_000_007A_01C473D8.718D43B0--