<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
          <<  Lancair Builders' Mail List  >>
          <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>
In a message dated 5/27/2001 9:39:43 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
lancair.list@olsusa.com writes:

<<make up the difference with a buildup of
 BIDs under the aft bearing block.   >>

I had to do this on one side only.  There should be no fore-and-aft play of
the landing gear leg between the blocks.  It took about 4-5 BID.  Came out
nicely.

However, your problem is that there's not enough room, not that there is free
play.  If I understand the proposed problem and solution, I would say that
removing a small amount of material from the back side of the big black block
(the aluminum block that bolts to the aft spar and holds the spherical
bearing) is the way to go.

My only concern is that aft forces should not compromise the spherical
bearing and pop it out of the aluminum block.  However, since it is captured
by the block and the spar, I don't see how this could happen, even if the
shoulder holding the bearing was sanded away entirely (though a milling
maching would be preferable if you have one).  Besides, the gear leg would
bear against the block before the shperical bearing was pushed against the
spar.

- Rob Wolf
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
LML website:   http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html
LML Builders' Bookstore:   http://www.buildersbooks.com/lancair

Please send your photos and drawings to marvkaye@olsusa.com.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>