Return-Path: Received: from pop3.olsusa.com ([63.150.212.2] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.4.5) with ESMTP id 773928 for rob@logan.com; Fri, 04 May 2001 18:30:54 -0400 Received: from qbert.gami.com ([38.193.29.253]) by pop3.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-71175U5500L550S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Fri, 4 May 2001 14:18:46 -0400 Received: by QBERT with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2650.21) id ; Fri, 4 May 2001 13:26:40 -0500 Message-ID: <52548863F8A5D411B530005004759A930126CC@QBERT> From: George Braly To: "'lancair.list@olsusa.com'" Subject: RE: transition:ROP to LOP Date: Fri, 4 May 2001 13:26:39 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Reply-To: lancair.list@olsusa.com <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Jon, Your question: >>One thing that is not obvious to me is why LOP operation seems to be predicated on having a very balanced fuel/air mixture to all the cylinders, i.e. why are GAMIjectors necessary? Why can carburated or non-GAMI'd engines run ROP (presumably also with poor mixture distribution) but not LOP? What is it that causes them to run rougher LOP than ROP?<< Excellent question. 1) When ROP, there is an excess of fuel. 3% more fuel will not make any additional horsepower. Subtracting 3% from the fuel flow, if it remains well rich of peak, will not hurt the horsepower. Why? Because all of the available O2 is already burned up and there is no available O2 to burn the extra fuel to make more heat. 2) By contrast, when LOP, there is a universal surplus of "AIR" (O2). Thus, if you add 3% of fuel, you will get almost exactly a 3% increase in horsepower. Subtract 3%, you drop 3% in horsepower. NOW... assume you have an engine that has uniform air flow to each cylinder (most IO-520/550 and TSIO520 engines do, with the exception of the so called "tuned" induction engines which are less than perfect). If you are rich of peak, variations in fuel flow from one cylinder to the next, make no difference in horsepower from one cylinder to the next. (see 1, above) BUT... on the contrary, when LOP, if cylinder 1 has 3% more fuel than cylinder 6, then cylinder 1 will make 3% more power than cylinder 6. (see 2, above) And THAT is why engines run rough when lean of peak. The cylinder to cylinder variation in fuel flow causes a corresponding cylinder to cylinder variation in baseline horsepower and that is perceived as roughness by the pilot and his significant other! Does that help? Regards, George >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML website: http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html LML Builders' Bookstore: http://www.buildersbooks.com/lancair Please send your photos and drawings to marvkaye@olsusa.com. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>