Return-Path: Received: from pop3.olsusa.com ([63.150.212.2] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.4.5) with ESMTP id 773668 for rob@logan.com; Fri, 04 May 2001 12:00:37 -0400 Received: from fire.phys.cmu.edu ([128.2.26.129]) by pop3.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-71175U5500L550S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Fri, 4 May 2001 11:03:47 -0400 Received: from localhost (jbp@localhost) by fire.phys.cmu.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3/Debian 8.9.3-21) with ESMTP id LAA25064 for ; Fri, 4 May 2001 11:10:22 -0400 Date: Fri, 4 May 2001 11:10:22 -0400 (EDT) From: Jeffery Peterson To: Lancair mail list Subject: LOP Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Reply-To: lancair.list@olsusa.com <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> George Braly: Could you send marvin plots of the data you show visitors? That would really help me understand. You could simply scan them or take digital photos. If you fax or mail or fedex plots to me I will turn them into an electronic form, and I will attempt to write captions for the plots that point out important features. I am bulding an LNC2 non-turbo, (IO-360A1A) and am toying with the idea of tuning the exhaust and perhaps the intake system. Following a set of articles in 1986 sport aviation, i am planning about 50 inches of 1.75 inch exhaust tube, then 4 into 1, then 25 inches of 2.75 inch tailpipe. no muffler. To make space for that I would get rid of the oil pan, instead using a 1 inch plate to collect oil into a reservior on the firewall. That would also give me cold intake air. That alone should give 10% in HP at cruise altitudes. Tuned exhaust might be worth 10% as well. What I really like about this system is the increase in performance at low altitude. Also, it has no moving parts, and no turbo shock cooling worries. I have not yet thought through the design of the tuned intake. If i have space I may add that as well. I find myself still confused about the proper way to adjust mixture in my case. Basically its pretty simple I guess, since without the turbo i dont have much risk of detonation except on climbout, right. But, is that right? Tuned exhaust (scavenging) and tuned induction act to increase the air/fuel charge for each power stroke. What really confuses me is that the standard accepted non-turbo climbout settings (full throttle, rich mixture) seem to risk detonation. Is it that full rich is SO rich at this mixture setting that burn speeds and peak temps are low? would that still be true if my exhaust and intake system increase the amount of air (but not fuel) in the cylinder at the start of the compression stroke? Thanks for all the help your are giving to the lancair community. Jeff Peterson LNC2 80% >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML website: http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html LML Builders' Bookstore: http://www.buildersbooks.com/lancair Please send your photos and drawings to marvkaye@olsusa.com. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>