Message-ID: <002b01c0d333$f29f68a0$bcb188ce@pavilion>
From: "J. N. Cameron" <toucan@The-I.net>
To: "Lancair List" <lancair.list@olsusa.com>
Subject: LOP Ops with normally aspirated engines
Date: Wed, 2 May 2001 13:15:58 -0500
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Reply-To: lancair.list@olsusa.com

          <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
          <<  Lancair Builders' Mail List  >>
          <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>
        What happened to the "lean burn" engine TCM seemed so proud of a few
years ago?  When I talked to the TCM rep at SnF this year, he acted like
he'd never heard of it, and grumped that TCM didn't recommend LOP
operations, period.

        I ran my first ES (IO-550-G) about 75 degrees LOP almost all the
time in cruise.  It seemed very happy there, smooth, nice and cool on EGT
and CHT.  The airspeed penalty was about 8 kts, the fuel burn reduction
about 20% (from 15 to 12 gph), which is pretty good savings in my book.
When we did a complete engine inspection at 80 hrs (pre-sale), everything
looked fine.

        Like anything else, there are always ways to screw up.  Leaning too
much, or at the wrong times, could cause problems, but so what?  The only
times I felt I didn't quite know what to do were when reducing power to
begin a descent.  Rather than chase the lean side of the curve all the way
down, I would usually flop it over to ROP and chase it down that side.
Either way, you have to fiddle the mixture all the way down.

Jim Cameron
ES (N143ES reserved)


>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
LML website:   http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html
LML Builders' Bookstore:   http://www.buildersbooks.com/lancair

Please send your photos and drawings to marvkaye@olsusa.com.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>