Return-Path: Received: from pop3.olsusa.com ([63.150.212.2] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.4.5) with ESMTP id 772008 for rob@logan.com; Tue, 01 May 2001 15:53:16 -0400 Received: from c000.snv.cp.net ([209.228.32.64]) by pop3.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-71175U5500L550S0V35) with SMTP id com for ; Tue, 1 May 2001 15:36:14 -0400 Received: (cpmta 3088 invoked from network); 1 May 2001 12:42:47 -0700 Received: from ppp109.tnt01.cola.compuzone.net (HELO mcm) (216.85.213.162) by smtp.froese.com (209.228.32.64) with SMTP; 1 May 2001 12:42:47 -0700 Message-ID: <000501c0d277$7de0ce80$0b01010a@compuzone.net> From: "Micah Froese" To: References: <52548863F8A5D411B530005004759A930126A1@QBERT> Subject: Re: LOP/ROP debate Date: Tue, 1 May 2001 15:47:00 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Reply-To: lancair.list@olsusa.com <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> There is an extensive article on LOP operations at www.gami.com/frames.htm Look under "future series" Could it be that those with bad experiences running LOP set their mixture in the following order? 1. lean mixture till the first cylinder peaks. 2. Cautiously lean 50F further. Doing this would probably cause some of the other 5 cylinders, (or other 3 for us mortals), to be dangerously close to peak, would it not? With a single probed EGT it would even be more hit-or-miss. Micah Froese >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML website: http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html LML Builders' Bookstore: http://www.buildersbooks.com/lancair Please send your photos and drawings to marvkaye@olsusa.com. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>