Return-Path: <lancair.list-request@olsusa.com>
Received: from pop3.olsusa.com ([63.150.212.2] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 3.4.5)
  with ESMTP id 771076 for rob@logan.com; Sun, 29 Apr 2001 18:20:43 -0400
Received: from imo-m04.mx.aol.com ([64.12.136.7]) by pop3.olsusa.com
          (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-71175U5500L550S0V35)
          with ESMTP id com for <lancair.list@olsusa.com>;
          Sun, 29 Apr 2001 14:04:51 -0400
Received: from N934td@cs.com
	by imo-m04.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v30.10.) id k.dc.59cab8c (3894)
	 for <lancair.list@olsusa.com>; Sun, 29 Apr 2001 14:11:12 -0400 (EDT)
From: N934td@cs.com
Message-ID: <dc.59cab8c.281db340@cs.com>
Date: Sun, 29 Apr 2001 14:11:12 EDT
Subject: Re: LOP / ROP
To: lancair.list@olsusa.com
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type:  text/plain; charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding:  7bit
X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com
Reply-To: lancair.list@olsusa.com

          <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
          <<  Lancair Builders' Mail List  >>
          <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>
Larry Klaas

LML

<<temps are the important thing...ROP or LOP....>>

Right! But you sacrifice range when ROP, significantly, and EGT's are higher 
ROP.
I'll bet your friend couldn't make it on his Mexico-Montana leg without 
running LOP.
You will only gain 20 Kts by running 75% power ROP, versus 58% power LOP. And 
you will lose 250 NM range in the process. Its a no-brainer.  22 gph versus 
15 gph.

Tony Durizzi

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
LML website:   http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html
LML Builders' Bookstore:   http://www.buildersbooks.com/lancair

Please send your photos and drawings to marvkaye@olsusa.com.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>