Return-Path: Received: from imo-m06.mx.aol.com ([64.12.136.161]) by ns1.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-71175U5500L550S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 13:21:34 -0500 Received: from Billhogarty@aol.com by imo-m06.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v29.14.) id k.87.8dd3a5f (1814) for ; Thu, 29 Mar 2001 13:29:47 -0500 (EST) From: Billhogarty@aol.com Message-ID: <87.8dd3a5f.27f4d91b@aol.com> Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2001 13:29:47 EST Subject: Learning to Fly To: lancair.list@olsusa.com X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Reply-To: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Cris: Learning to fly in your own plane makes sense if you can afford it. When the Air Force taught me how to fly (many years ago), the course included 20 hours in a piper cub, then 120 hours in a T-6. (600 hp), then 40 hours in a T-28 (800 hp) and finally 120 hours in a T-33. This was a pretty accelerated course that also included formation, acrobatics, and instruments. The point is that learning to fly in high horsepower machines isnt anything new. It might be more practical to analyze the expenses incurred in using a Lancair as a trainer. Fast is fun but faster is not a requirement for learning how to fly. If your going to do any traveling in your Lancair, then an instrument rating is a necessity BUT faster is not a requirement to practise your instument flying. Anyway, if you have the bucks to burn, WHY NOT??? Regards, Bill Hogarty >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML website: http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html LML Builders' Bookstore: http://www.buildersbooks.com/lancair Please send your photos and drawings to marvkaye@olsusa.com. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>