Return-Path: Received: from wind.imbris.com ([216.18.130.7]) by ns1.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-71175U5500L550S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 10:16:09 -0500 Received: from regandesigns.com (cda131-64.imbris.com [216.18.131.64]) by wind.imbris.com (8.11.2/8.9.3) with ESMTP id f2NFQfX02337 for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2001 07:26:41 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <3ABB4E9C.BB281572@regandesigns.com> Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2001 07:24:44 -0600 From: Brent Regan To: Lancair List Subject: To P or not to P X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Reply-To: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> David is absolutely right. Non pressurized IVs are lighter, and therefore faster. Pressurized IVs will always have a higher resale value. The resale value will be greater than the incremental cost of the kit and labor. This has been demonstrated in the sale priced of the few IVs that have been traded. There is no right or better answer. It is a question of preference and therefore defies all rational analysis. "Because I like it that way." trumps all other arguments. Regards Brent Regan >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML website: http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html LML Builders' Bookstore: http://www.buildersbooks.com/lancair Please send your photos and drawings to marvkaye@olsusa.com. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>