Return-Path: Received: from simmer.isd.net ([208.159.192.42]) by ns1.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-70783U4500L450S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Wed, 14 Feb 2001 15:57:02 -0500 Received: from laptop (isd-du-208-238-141-143.isd.net [208.238.141.143]) by simmer.isd.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id PAA17695 for ; Wed, 14 Feb 2001 15:05:37 -0600 Message-ID: <001101c096c9$31456c00$8f8deed0@laptop> From: "Bob and Patti Foxwell" To: "Marv @ Lancair List" Subject: autopilots Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2001 15:00:40 -0600 X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Reply-To: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Has anyone installed or flown Sierra's autopilot? Another Es builder and myself were impressed by the compactness and simplicity of the servos as well as the fact that it will fly from input from the sfs2000. However, I don't care to be a pioneer. I'm planning on just one sfs screen for my primary flight screen and instead of a second screen for nav, I was thinking of a garmin 430 (for the same price as a second Sierra screen.) That way I will have not only redundancy, but radios to boot. I think I'll also be able to legally file a gps flight plan. As a followup question, will either or both the Sierra or Garmin feed route or approach info to any of the S-tec's? Thanks Bob Foxwell - Somewhere between 30% and 60% ES >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML website: http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html LML Builders' Bookstore: http://www.buildersbooks.com/lancair Please send your photos and drawings to marvkaye@olsusa.com. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>