X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 12 May 2014 07:39:18 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from rc5-smtp.comporium.net ([208.104.2.19] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.9e) with ESMTP id 6866157 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 09 May 2014 15:59:40 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=208.104.2.19; envelope-from=snopercod@comporium.net Received: from bar01.comporium.net ([208.104.244.60]) by rc5-smtp.comporium.net ({548c1f54-a96b-4a18-a171-d2818e6ccf4d}) via TCP (outbound) with ESMTP id 20140509195907815 for ; Fri, 09 May 2014 19:59:07 +0000 X-RC-FROM: X-RC-RCPT: X-ASG-Debug-ID: 1399665546-07cf4e4b77246b10001-yPXFKn Received: from rg20.comporium.net (rg20.comporium.net [208.104.2.10]) by barracuda. with ESMTP id jkSnguHvW1A3VhUI for ; Fri, 09 May 2014 15:59:06 -0400 (EDT) X-Barracuda-Envelope-From: snopercod@comporium.net X-Barracuda-Apparent-Source-IP: 208.104.2.10 Received: from 33.225.235.68.dsl.brvdnc.dynamic.citcom.Net (EHLO _127.0.0.1_) ([68.235.225.33]) by rg20.comporium.net (MOS 4.3.4-GA FastPath queued) with ESMTP id BCN04726 (AUTH snopercod); Fri, 09 May 2014 15:59:06 -0400 (EDT) X-Original-Message-ID: <536D3382.8090903@comporium.net> X-Original-Date: Fri, 09 May 2014 15:58:58 -0400 From: John Cooper User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List Subject: Re: [LML] [LNC2] Fast taxi testing - found the problem Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------050204060109070003070502" X-ASG-Orig-Subj: Re: [LML] [LNC2] Fast taxi testing - found the problem X-Barracuda-Connect: rg20.comporium.net[208.104.2.10] X-Barracuda-Start-Time: 1399665546 X-Barracuda-URL: http://208.104.2.35:8000/cgi-mod/mark.cgi X-Virus-Scanned: by bsmtpd at comporium.net X-Barracuda-BRTS-Status: 1 X-Barracuda-Spam-Score: 0.00 X-Barracuda-Spam-Status: No, SCORE=0.00 using global scores of TAG_LEVEL=1000.0 QUARANTINE_LEVEL=1000.0 KILL_LEVEL=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE X-Barracuda-Spam-Report: Code version 3.2, rules version 3.2.3.5677 Rule breakdown below pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- 0.00 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message X-MAG-OUTBOUND: comporium.redcondor.net@208.104.244.48/28 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------050204060109070003070502 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Thanks for the link to the Timpken Engineering Manual. It was very informative. All these years I had thought that bearings should have a tiny bit of end-play to allow for thermal expansion, but Timken says that's not true. On Pg. 82 they state: "Generally, the ideal operating bearing setting is near zero to maximize bearing life (fig. 83). Most bearings are set with endplay at assembly to reach the desired near-zero setting at operating temperature. There is an ideal bearing setting value for every application. To achieve this condition, the bearing setting must take into account deflection under load (radial + axial) as well as thermal expansions and material used. Figure 83 indicates that bearings have a longer life with a small pre-load. Live and learn. I guess the only way to set the end play accurately would be with a dial indicator so I just ordered one from Amazon for $25. One would have to test the end play cold and then hot. So maybe my problem all along was the right brake locking up and not the tightness of the bearings (or both)???? > John, > A little pre-load is actually beneficial in roller bearings. You > apparently had a too much on one wheel. > I re-grease my bearings every year and during installation tighten the > nut until I get just under one revolution of spin. It is a good idea > to re-check this after a few hours of use. > http://www.timken.com/en-us/products/Documents/Timken-Engineering-Manual.pdf > > Chris Zavatson > N91CZ > 360std > www.N91CZ.net > --------------050204060109070003070502 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Thanks for the link to the Timpken Engineering Manual. It was very informative. All these years I had thought that bearings should have a tiny bit of end-play to allow for thermal expansion, but Timken says that's not true. On Pg. 82 they state:
"Generally, the ideal operating bearing setting is near zero to
maximize bearing life (fig. 83). Most bearings are set with endplay
at assembly to reach the desired near-zero setting at operating
temperature.

There is an ideal bearing setting value for every application. To
achieve this condition, the bearing setting must take into account
deflection under load (radial + axial) as well as thermal expansions
and material used.
Figure 83 indicates that bearings have a longer life with a small pre-load. Live and learn. I guess the only way to set the end play accurately would be with a dial indicator so I just ordered one from Amazon for $25. One would have to test the end play cold and then hot.

So maybe my problem all along was the right brake locking up and not the tightness of the bearings (or both)????


John,
A little pre-load is actually beneficial in roller bearings.  You apparently had a too much on one wheel.
I re-grease my bearings every year and during installation tighten the nut until I get just under one revolution of spin.  It is a good idea to re-check this after a few hours of use.

Chris Zavatson
N91CZ
360std


--------------050204060109070003070502--