X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 12:37:09 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mailgate.tru.ca ([192.146.156.111] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.9e) with ESMTP id 6850007 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 12:13:50 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=192.146.156.111; envelope-from=DBaleshta@tru.ca Received: from mailgate.tru.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 6E6C938364 for ; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 09:08:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from mail-relay.tru.ca (mail-relay.tru.ca [192.146.156.166]) by mailgate.tru.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7E3338361 for ; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 09:08:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from tru-univ-casint.tru.univ (tru-univ-casint.tru.ca [198.162.23.234]) by mail-relay.tru.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23F29A6601 for ; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 09:13:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from TRU-UNIV-EXMBX2.tru.univ ([fe80::9452:3812:32ee:160f]) by tru-univ-casint.tru.univ ([2002:c6a2:17ea::c6a2:17ea]) with mapi id 14.03.0158.001; Mon, 28 Apr 2014 09:13:14 -0700 From: Doug Baleshta X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List Subject: RE: [LML] Re: Gear Down...INOP Thread-Topic: [LML] Re: Gear Down...INOP Thread-Index: AQHPYvw/iqBryOTeC0+jrfDaNq9PopsnMqig X-Original-Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2014 16:13:13 +0000 X-Original-Message-ID: <286E3721ADF2544F80FE374F2D8D26917741A062@tru-univ-exmbx2.tru.univ> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: x-originating-ip: [206.123.172.236] Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-PMX-Version: 6.0.3.2322014, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.2.2107409, Antispam-Data: 2014.4.28.160320 X-PerlMx-Spam: Gauge=XIII, Probability=13%, Report=' __CP_URI_IN_BODY! 0.5, TO_IN_SUBJECT 0.5, HTML_00_01 0.05, HTML_00_10 0.05, SUPERLONG_LINE 0.05, BODY_SIZE_5000_5999 0, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS 0, ECARD_KNOWN_DOMAINS 0, URI_ENDS_IN_HTML 0, WEBMAIL_SOURCE 0, WEBMAIL_XOIP 0, WEBMAIL_X_IP_HDR 0, __ANY_URI 0, __BOUNCE_CHALLENGE_SUBJ 0, __BOUNCE_NDR_SUBJ_EXEMPT 0, __CP_MEDIA_BODY 0, __CT 0, __CTE 0, __CT_TEXT_PLAIN 0, __FORWARDED_MSG 0, __FRAUD_BODY_WEBMAIL 0, __FRAUD_WEBMAIL 0, __HAS_FROM 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __HAS_XOIP 0, __IMS_MSGID 0, __IN_REP_TO 0, __MIME_TEXT_ONLY 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __SUBJ_ALPHA_NEGATE 0, __TO_IN_SUBJECT 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __URI_NS ' I have also worked with Chris on several items on my project for the past y= ears. He is honest, diligent and his research skills are exemplary. As Ke= vin mentions, he strives to find the correct answer through his research an= d discussions with other pilots. There is no need to malign people on this list. Doug -----Original Message----- From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Kevi= n Stallard Sent: April-28-14 9:10 AM To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: [LML] Re: Gear Down...INOP Wolfgang, I am surprised that you remain unconvinced. Chris' analysis on this topic = has been the most thorough and careful analysis I've encountered. He doesn= 't just look at the outside symptoms of the problem, but also delves into a= spects of the pump and its design (the number of different configurations a= nd variations available) that I never even considered previously. I thought it was just a pump, I had no idea that the inner workings had suc= h an impact on how the system operated until he took the time to take me th= rough it all. =20 I have had the opportunity to work directly with Chris in a professional se= tting, I have not encountered a more keen understanding of how things work = and what questions to ask when things go wrong than that of Mr. Zavatson. = He has been able to point out errors in my thinking and how I look at probl= ems in a way that has been very beneficial to me. =20 These remarks that you have directed to him concern me greatly. You aren't= asking any questions, you aren't having a discussion, you aren't trying to= reconcile the deficit of your understanding of these things, you are attac= king him personally. That's where you are losing me. I'm starting to believe that the results of someone following your advice = and using your system could have dangerous if not life threatening conseque= nces. =20 I think what I would like to see from you is a bit more effort to reconcile= your the observations Chris has replicated numerous times on the bench and= in the air. This is what I'm used to seeing when good willed scientists a= nd engineers disagree. I have observed Chris quickly change course if evidence is presented that r= efutes his conclusions. He is not concerned with being right, he is concer= ned with what is right, constantly rechecking and questioning his own resul= ts.. I think you are a very smart and capable individual and we would all = benefit if you adopted these same principles. Thank you, Kevin Stallard N969RJ 150 hrs and counting! ________________________________________ From: Lancair Mailing List [lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Wolfgang [W= olfgang@MiCom.net] Sent: Monday, April 28, 2014 5:59 AM To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: [LML] Re: Gear Down...INOP Chris, I remain unconvinced with your theory. You have suggested that the pump wil= l somehow shut down immediately after it has started up due to some pressur= e pulse. The mechanisim of which you have yet to clarify, let alone demonst= rated. I'm tired of your kibitzing and since you have proven that you can't let it= go, I will and leave you to humor yourself. Wolfgang ----- Original Message ----- From: Chris Zavatson To: lml@lancaironline.net Sent: Saturday, April 26, 2014 1:28 PM Subject: Gear Down...INOP Wolfgang, <<"I believe in redundancy and it looks like you don't....">> I am a big proponent of redundancy. That is redundancy defined as a true b= ack-up to an otherwise trouble-free system. First, I have redundant switches to power the pump solenoids. This allows = me to raise and lower the gear in case of the failure of either of the pres= sure switches. It doesn't happen very often, but it does happen - twice in= 17 years of flying my 360. I also have redundant gear down indications. Two completely separate syste= ms, separate switches, separate wires and separate indicators. The second = set of switches is mounted directly on the over-center links. I even carry two iPads and a iPhone - just in case <<"The pressure pulse you're talking about will subside (glad you agree) an= d as it does, because the cylinder is only partially extended, the cylinder= will continues to extend, the low switch will close again, and enable the = pump to continue . .">> The part you seem to be missing here is that the momentary pulse is not dir= ectly turning off the pump. Thus when the pulse subsides, the pump doesn't= just spring back to life. The pulse pushes the spool in the wrong directi= on -against the pump flow. This locks the poppet that the pump just opened= up a fraction of a second earlier. When this happens, the high side begin= s to pressurize along with the low side. As soon as both sides reach the l= ow side pressure setting, the pump is turned off. This is why you see both= high and low circuits pressurized to the same value in Lorn's photo. To prevent this, the low side pressure settings should be raised. 800 psi = has proven sufficient. The high volume gear pump will reduce the size of t= he pulse since the higher volume pump is able to absorb incoming fluid at a= higher rate. I highly recommend pressure gauges for both high and low circuit be install= ed in a location visible to the pilot. The state of the system can always = be verified. One can immediately diagnose any in-flight problem. Leaks ca= n be caught early. And adjusting pressure settings is no longer guess work= . Chris Zavatson N91CZ 360std www.N91CZ.net -- For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html