X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 10:06:55 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from vms173001pub.verizon.net ([206.46.173.1] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.9e) with ESMTP id 6830007 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 16 Apr 2014 07:56:27 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=206.46.173.1; envelope-from=Adam@ValidationPartners.com Received: from VpiWorkstation1 ([unknown] [69.124.233.79]) by vms173001.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.02 32bit (built Apr 16 2009)) with ESMTPA id <0N4400KEWH4QL0A0@vms173001.mailsrvcs.net> for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 16 Apr 2014 06:55:43 -0500 (CDT) From: "Adam Molny" X-Original-To: Subject: RE: Flowscan mounting locations X-Original-Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2014 07:55:38 -0400 X-Original-Message-id: MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 Thread-index: Ac9Ynni7wq+FD9vHRDKRxuxtmRpQQgAyqosgAABaMZA= X-MIMEOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6157 Jeff, Keep in mind that Continental engines have a vapor return line coming off the engine-driven fuel pump. If you install the sensor in the feed line going TO the pump you will get inaccurate (high) readings. Some engine monitors have the ability to subtract two fuel flow readings, so you could install two sensors, one on the feed line and one on the return, but that sounds like a lot of trouble. Adam Molny >>Is it okay to mount a flowscan fuel flow sensor inside the cabin? Thanks Jeff