Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #69615
From: Todd Long <toddlong1@gmail.com>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Lancair IV-PT Accident Report
Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 13:28:10 -0400
To: <lml@lancaironline.net>
Yes. That's what I'm asking. Being  able to transfer to the wings and not have to draw off the belly tank was a very smart idea. Gear up is one thing. Gear up fireball.....whole other league. 

Sent from my iPhone

On Mar 28, 2014, at 10:28, vtailjeff@aol.com wrote:

Todd,
 
I presume you are asking if someone could make a gear up landing on one and not compromise the tank?
 
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: Robert R Pastusek <rpastusek@htii.com>
To: Lancair Mailing List <lml@lancaironline.net>
Sent: Fri, Mar 28, 2014 9:25 am
Subject: [LML] Re: Lancair IV-PT Accident Report

Todd,
Belly tanks to support the higher fuel consumption of the turbines, were a builder add-on, and are all different. Some were better-engineered than others, but there is no standard for them. This, and the associated fuel system plumbing for the turbine, are truly “builder option.”
Bob
 
From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Todd Long
Sent: Friday, March 28, 2014 9:52 AM
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Subject: [LML] Re: Lancair IV-PT Accident Report
 
Since I am unfamiliar, what is the structural integrity of the belly tank during a belly landing? The jets I fly all have structural keels to protect it during an incident. 

Sent from my iPhone

On Mar 28, 2014, at 7:28, Jeff Edwards <vtailjeff@aol.com> wrote:
Wow! 

Sent from my iPad

On Mar 27, 2014, at 2:21 PM, Robert R Pastusek <rpastusek@htii.com> wrote:
Please note the following preliminary accident report for an IV-PT loss on 8 March, 2014. Although we did not know any details of the accident at the time, I was asked to write the attached paper discussing the operating principles of the Lancair IV landing gear system. Please find this paper attached for your information.
 
Bob
 
 
NTSB Identification: ERA14FA144
14 CFR Part 91: General Aviation
Accident occurred Saturday, March 08, 2014 in Hartsville, SC
Aircraft: ROGERS GEORGE T LANCAIR IVP, registration: N724HP
Injuries: 3 Fatal.
This is preliminary information, subject to change, and may contain errors. Any errors in this report will be corrected when the final report has been completed. NTSB investigators either traveled in support of this investigation or conducted a significant amount of investigative work without any travel, and used data obtained from various sources to prepare this aircraft accident report.

On March 8, 2014, about 1858 eastern standard time, an experimental amateur built Lancair IVP, N724HP, was substantially damaged after a loss of control in Hartsville, South Carolina. The private pilot, and the two pilot rated passengers were fatally injured. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed, and no flight plan was filed for the local personal flight conducted under Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 91, which departed Darlington County Jetport (UDG), Darlington, South Carolina.

According to witnesses, the private pilot had been having problems with the airplane's landing gear system and had been receiving a "Gear Unsafe" indication. Earlier on the day of the accident he was observed working on the airplane and when queried by one of the witnesses, the pilot advised him that he was troubleshooting an electrical problem.

Later that day, the private pilot and one of the pilot rated passengers, departed UDG, flew around the local area "for some time," and then landed at Hartsville Regional Airport (HVS), Hartsville, South Carolina. At 1510 the private pilot refueled the airplane with 50 gallons of fuel and then at approximately 1610 took off alone and returned to UDG. Sometime after returning to UDG, the private pilot took off again, this time not only with the pilot rated passenger he had been flying with earlier that day but, also with an additional pilot rated passenger.

At approximately 1819, a relative of the private pilot received a text message asking him to come to HVS, as the landing gear would not come down. Then at 1836 he received a second message to "Call 911." Around the time that the private pilot sent the text, a witness observed the airplane pass by him numerous times during an approximately 15 minute long period. The airplane was "low" to the ground. On the last pass, he could hear the airplane's engine running, and observed the airplane fly across HVS about midfield at 600 to 700 feet above ground level, bank sharply to the left, pitch up to about 25 degrees nose up, then descend rapidly in a nose high attitude until he lost sight of the airplane. Moments later, he heard the sound of impact, and observed a large fire ball and smoke.

Examination of the accident site revealed that the airplane had struck two trees before making ground contact, and coming to rest next to a row of trees. Multiple pieces of wood were present on the ground which exhibited evidence of propeller strike marks.

Examination of the wreckage revealed that it had been exposed to a postcrash fire and that there was no evidence of any preimpact structural failure. The wing flaps were in the up position, and flight control continuity was established from the cockpit flight controls, to the breaks in the system which showed evidence of tensile overload and from the breaks in the system, to the mounting locations of the flight control surfaces.

Examination of the propeller revealed evidence of S-bending, leading edge gouging, and chordwise scratching. Examination of the engine's single stage axial flow propulsor utilizing a borescope revealed evidence of rotational scoring and reverse bending on multiple turbine blades.

Examination of the landing gear system revealed that the landing gear handle was in the down position however, the nose landing gear was in the "up" position. The left and right main landing gear were partially extended, and the left main landing gear leg was fractured into two pieces. Examination of the main landing gear doors indicated that the right main landing gear door was closed during the impact sequence and the left main landing gear door was open during the impact sequence. Examination of the hydraulic reservoir revealed it was not full, and only contained about 10 tablespoons of hydraulic fluid. During the examination, no leaks were discovered in the reservoir.

Further examination of the wreckage also revealed that the seat cushion for the right rear seat was displaced from its normal mounting position and an access panel which was located beneath that mounting location, and which would allow access to the main landing gear actuators, had been removed. Examination of the panel revealed scratch and pry marks on its topside, near one edge, and an open jackknife was discovered on the floor in close proximity to the panel.
 
<Lancair IV Landing Gear Operation 3-2014.docx>
Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster