X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2014 15:40:19 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from argon.lunarpages.com ([216.97.227.30] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.8) with ESMTPS id 6671045 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 06 Jan 2014 15:14:54 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=216.97.227.30; envelope-from=thorn@starflight.aero Received: from 71-218-218-7.hlrn.qwest.net ([71.218.218.7]:52935 helo=VAlien2) by argon.lunarpages.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.77) (envelope-from ) id 1W0GYn-0004Pz-RK for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 06 Jan 2014 12:14:15 -0800 From: "Valin & Allyson Thorn" X-Original-To: "'Lancair Mailing List'" X-Original-Cc: "Valin & Allyson Thorn" References: In-Reply-To: Subject: RE: [LML] Legacy Flight Perf Model Accuracy in Flight Sim X? X-Original-Date: Mon, 6 Jan 2014 13:13:39 -0700 X-Original-Message-ID: <006701cf0b1b$d111a210$7334e630$@starflight.aero> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0068_01CF0AE1.24B75DF0" X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 15.0 Thread-Index: AQGvZxQbq25NOBjTMXKz6ew9XcSZlJq3YVvA Content-Language: en-us X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - argon.lunarpages.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - lancaironline.net X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - starflight.aero X-Get-Message-Sender-Via: argon.lunarpages.com: authenticated_id: thorn@starflight.aero This is a multipart message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0068_01CF0AE1.24B75DF0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Okay, looks like no one's made any comparisons on their Legacy's performance vs. this simulated one. So, if some Legacy flyers could relay the performance of their airplanes at any of these conditions that would help me validate or tune the simulated Legacy's performance. I'm not looking for precise engineering data - just your casual flight experience from memory would be fine, for any of these conditions or others -- approximations are fine. Should be able to type into this table below if it survives the email transmission intact. Thanks guys! Valin Lancair Legacy Flight Performance Data Points Condition Altitude (MSL-Ft) Airspeed (KIAS) Gross Weight (lbs) Power Setting Comments MAP (In Hg) Tach (RPM) Climb Vy Climb Cruise Level Cruise Flight (75% Power) Econo Cruise Level Flight Clean NA 120 Level Flight Gear Down NA 120 Downwind, Level Flt, Clean Config NA Final Approach Landing Config NA From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Valin & Allyson Thorn Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2014 8:19 AM To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: [LML] Legacy Flight Perf Model Accuracy in Flight Sim X? Hey LML gang, Has anyone compared their Lancair Legacy airplane's flight performance to the RealAir simulated Legacy model for the Microsoft Flight Simulator? http://www.realairsimulations.com/legacy_overview.php?page=legacyfsx_overvie w If you have, would appreciate your opinions, thoughts about its flight performance accuracy.. Thanks, Valin Thorn Legacy Project Boulder, Colorado ------=_NextPart_000_0068_01CF0AE1.24B75DF0 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Okay, looks like no one’s made any = comparisons on their Legacy’s performance vs. this simulated = one. =

So, if some Legacy flyers could relay the = performance of their airplanes at any of these conditions that would = help me validate or tune the simulated Legacy’s performance. I’m not looking for = precise engineering data – just your casual flight experience from = memory would be fine, for any of these conditions or others -- approximations are fine.

Should be able to type into this table below if it = survives the email transmission intact.

Thanks guys!

Valin

Lancair Legacy Flight = Performance Data Points
Condition	Altitude (MSL-Ft)<= /o:p>	Airspeed = (KIAS)	Gross Weight = (lbs)	Power = Setting	Comments=
				MAP (In = Hg)	Tach<= span style=3D'font-size:10.0pt;font-family:"Century = Gothic","sans-serif";mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New = Roman";mso-bidi-font-family:Arial;color:white'> (RPM)
Climb Vy
Climb = Cruise
Level Cruise Flight (75% = Power)
Econo Cruise
Level Flight = Clean	NA	120
Level Flight Gear = Down	NA	120
Downwind, Level Flt, Clean Config	NA
Final Approach Landing Config	NA

From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On = Behalf Of Valin & Allyson Thorn
Sent: Thursday, = January 02, 2014 8:19 AM
To: = lml@lancaironline.net
Subject: [LML] Legacy Flight Perf Model = Accuracy in Flight Sim X?

Hey LML = gang,

Has anyone compared their Lancair = Legacy airplane’s flight performance to the RealAir simulated = Legacy model for the Microsoft Flight Simulator?

http://www.realairsimulations.com/legacy_overview.php?pag= e=3Dlegacyfsx_overview

If you have, would appreciate your = opinions, thoughts about its flight performance = accuracy….

Thanks,

Valin Thorn

Legacy = Project

Boulder, = Colorado

------=_NextPart_000_0068_01CF0AE1.24B75DF0--