Return-Path: Received: from imo-r18.mx.aol.com ([152.163.225.72]) by ns1.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-64832U3500L350S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Tue, 19 Sep 2000 19:14:49 -0400 Received: from CasaDeHate@aol.com by imo-r18.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v28.15.) id k.9f.ae0539a (4340) for ; Tue, 19 Sep 2000 19:21:41 -0400 (EDT) From: CasaDeHate@aol.com Message-ID: <9f.ae0539a.26f94f04@aol.com> Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2000 19:21:40 EDT Subject: Leading edge tape To: lancair.list@olsusa.com X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Reply-To: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> << Are there any opinions as to instability caused by leading edge tape on the LNC2? >> The NLF variant airfoil on the Lancair aircraft don't seem to mind a narrow (1") tape on the wing Leading Edge as long as it is a thin tape, I've never experienced any problems with the tape except that it yellows due to UV. Keep it as narrow as possible to avoid tripping the boundary layer. The wing I mentioned earlier (early EZE) was considered a "critical airfoil" and as such was subject to degredation of lift from simple bug impingement, and even worse it was intolerant of rain... Mike DeHate >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML website: http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html LML Builders' Bookstore: http://www.buildersbooks.com/lancair Please send your photos and drawings to marvkaye@olsusa.com. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>