X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 12:00:29 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from p3plex2out03.prod.phx3.secureserver.net ([184.168.131.16] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.7) with ESMTP id 6549144 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 11:51:47 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=184.168.131.16; envelope-from=pete@leapfrogventures.com Received: from P3PW5EX1HT005.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET ([72.167.180.47]) by p3plex2out03.prod.phx3.secureserver.net with secureserver.net id frqR1m00811lQaG01rrDFH; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 08:51:13 -0700 Received: from P3PW5EX1MB14.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET ([10.6.135.86]) by P3PW5EX1HT005.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET ([72.167.180.134]) with mapi; Mon, 21 Oct 2013 08:51:10 -0700 From: "pete@leapfrogventures.com" X-Original-To: "lml@lancaironline.net" X-Original-Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2013 08:51:07 -0700 Subject: RE: [LML] Re: Dukes Outflow valve repair Thread-Topic: [LML] Re: Dukes Outflow valve repair Thread-Index: Ac7OUekcnp0o+N3/SeKnNwfXOllRAAAI0xTA X-Original-Message-ID: <2A14E6258A8534418F5498D73CCA51EF2257BC93A9@P3PW5EX1MB14.EX1.SECURESERVER.NET> References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_2A14E6258A8534418F5498D73CCA51EF2257BC93A9P3PW5EX1MB14E_" MIME-Version: 1.0 --_000_2A14E6258A8534418F5498D73CCA51EF2257BC93A9P3PW5EX1MB14E_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable See my previous posts on this matter. I went through the same waste of tim= e with Dukes. Maybe I should just start a business to test and repair thes= e darn things. Pete From: Paul Miller [mailto:pjdmiller@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2013 4:35 AM To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Dukes Outflow valve repair $5,000 is a lot when it could be solenoid, seating, leak, controller or lin= es. Can you isolate the problem further? What kind of test tells you the= valve is not moving? Most of the problems I've seen are dirty seals which= can be cleaned or worn seals that get replaced. On 2013-10-18, at 1:49 PM, Tom Warren > wrote: appears that the outflow valve is not responsive --_000_2A14E6258A8534418F5498D73CCA51EF2257BC93A9P3PW5EX1MB14E_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

See my previous posts on this matter= . I went through the same waste of time with Dukes. Maybe I sho= uld just start a business to test and repair these darn things.<= /span>

Pete<= /span>

<= p class=3DMsoNormal>From: Paul Miller [mailto:pjdmiller@gmail.com] Sent: Monday, October 21, 2= 013 4:35 AM
To: lml@lanca= ironline.net
Subject: Re:= [LML] Re: Dukes Outflow valve repair

$5,000 is a lot when it could be solenoid, seating, leak, controller or li= nes. Can you isolate the problem further? What kind of test te= lls you the valve is not moving? Most of the problems I've seen are d= irty seals which can be cleaned or worn seals that get replaced.=

On 2013-10-18, at 1:49 PM, Tom Warren <warrent@flash.net> wrote:

appears that the outflow valve is not responsive<= /span>

= --_000_2A14E6258A8534418F5498D73CCA51EF2257BC93A9P3PW5EX1MB14E_--