X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 12:49:00 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [8.31.233.120] (HELO server209.appriver.com) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.7) with ESMTPS id 6541612 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 11:36:30 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=8.31.233.120; envelope-from=gwbraly@gami.com X-Note-AR-ScanTimeLocal: 10/15/2013 11:35:56 AM X-Policy: GLOBAL - gami.com X-Primary: gwbraly@gami.com X-Note: This Email was scanned by AppRiver SecureTide X-Virus-Scan: V- X-Note-SnifferID: 0 X-Note: TCH-CT/SI:0-50/SG:2 10/15/2013 11:35:31 AM X-GBUdb-Analysis: 0, 68.89.254.181, Ugly c=0.526792 p=-0.927711 Source Normal X-Signature-Violations: 0-0-0-8281-c X-Note-419: 15.6003 ms. Fail:1 Chk:1350 of 1350 total X-Note: SCH-CT/SI:1-1350/SG:1 10/15/2013 11:35:46 AM X-Note: Spam Tests Failed: X-Country-Path: PRIVATE->UNITED STATES->LOCAL X-Note-Sending-IP: 68.89.254.181 X-Note-Reverse-DNS: 68-89-254-181.gami.com X-Note-Return-Path: gwbraly@gami.com X-Note: User Rule Hits: X-Note: Global Rule Hits: G340 G341 G342 G343 G347 G348 G457 X-Note: Encrypt Rule Hits: X-Note: Mail Class: VALID X-Note: Headers Injected Received: from [68.89.254.181] (HELO gamimail1.Gami.local) by server209.appriver.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.2) with ESMTPS id 40373517 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 11:35:56 -0400 Received: from gamimail1.Gami.local ([10.10.12.14]) by gamimail1.Gami.local ([10.10.12.14]) with mapi; Tue, 15 Oct 2013 10:35:53 -0500 From: George Braly X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List X-Original-Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2013 10:35:51 -0500 Subject: RE: [LML] Re: LOP ops on O-360 A1A Thread-Topic: [LML] Re: LOP ops on O-360 A1A Thread-Index: Ac7JqW9vxDgKN8DkTVmDJKt1rfIY5AAEq5OQ X-Original-Message-ID: References: In-Reply-To: Accept-Language: en-US Content-Language: en-US X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: acceptlanguage: en-US Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 Try using some carb heat. It will smooth out that engine significantly w= hen LOP. =20 The warmer induction air does a much more uniform job of distributing the f= uel as vapor with less liquid drop outs in the induction plumbing.=20 -----Original Message----- From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of vtai= ljeff@aol.com Sent: Tuesday, October 15, 2013 8:21 AM To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: [LML] Re: LOP ops on O-360 A1A Have you checked your baffling? Sent from my iPad On Oct 15, 2013, at 7:53 AM, Keith Smith wrote: > Hey all, >=20 > I'm waiting for winter to come around but it seems like my O-360 A1A has = been running warmer than usual, requiring me to power back very shortly aft= er takeoff to avoid an excursion north of 425 degree CHT's. >=20 > In any case, I know that LOP ops are hard to come by with an O-360 due to= poor fuel distribution. Indeed, my #4 cylinder peaks well before the other= s, making it tricky to get them LOP. >=20 > I've been running in two modes...one is around 20 LOP to cool it down to = around 385 CHT while the others run just slightly rich of peak. I can do th= is without much effort, and under a wide range of throttle positions, and d= ensity altitudes. >=20 > On a recent flight, though, I found #1 and #3 settling on temps that were= just too high to be happy with. I would go well ROP to get them cooled, bu= t burned a lot of fuel in the process and still had a warm 4th cylinder due= to the fact that it runs quite a bit leaner. This was all done at 75% powe= r or less, btw, density altitude was well above 11k (I was at 11k and it wa= s +10C) >=20 > Eventually, I tried something somewhat dramatic. I was determined to get = ALL the cylinders LOP. I leaned relatively rapidly and ignored the disconce= rting knocking/shuddering associated with the uneven amounts of power being= produced between the 4th cylinder and all the rest. >=20 > It all happened a bit quickly, but with cylinder 1-3 roughly 20-40 LOP an= d #4 70-90 LOP, the CHTs dropped like a stone, seemingly in seconds, down t= o 380-385 across the board for #1-3 with #4 now in the 350-360 range. With = careful fiddling of the mixture, and countless experiments with throttle po= sition, I got the vibration down to the point where it was barely noticeabl= e. Eventually it just felt smooth...but I can't tell if I got used to it, o= r things just settled down, although I wouldn't think it was possible. >=20 > Final fuel flow was around 8.8-9.0 gph. >=20 > Finally, living the LOP dream with my O-360 :) >=20 > I tried repeating this later on, down low and wasn't able to repeat it (i= e, never got it smooth). >=20 > So, it's elusive, but possibly doable under just the right circumstances.= Since I do long trips on a regular basis, I'm definitely interested in mak= ing this work. >=20 > Separately, I'll try to find out why it's running warmer in general. I di= d have a mag replaced, the other rebuilt, and 4 new plugs installed in the = last year. >=20 > Honestly, I'm going to try to save some clams and get this converted to a= n IO-360 (didn't realize it was relatively inexpensive until my mechanic su= ggested it), get balanced injectors and run LOP as SOP. The difference in c= ooling really is staggering. I know I'm probably preaching to the choir, bu= t I thought that O-360 owners might find it eye opening. Get up high and gi= ve it a try if you have a 4 point engine monitor. You'll know it's working = when your leaning results in EGT and CHT's coming down :) >=20 > The trip, btw, was N07-KFTW-KSAV-N07, around 2600nm. >=20 > Keith -- For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html