X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 07:55:10 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from smtp144.iad.emailsrvr.com ([207.97.245.144] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.5) with ESMTPS id 6372810 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 14 Jul 2013 18:16:00 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=207.97.245.144; envelope-from=lalcorn@natca.net Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp54.relay.iad1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 5485A2B0E33 for ; Sun, 14 Jul 2013 18:15:24 -0400 (EDT) X-Virus-Scanned: OK Received: from legacy7.wa-web.iad1a (legacy7.wa-web.iad1a.rsapps.net [192.168.2.216]) by smtp54.relay.iad1a.emailsrvr.com (SMTP Server) with ESMTP id 4035D2B0DF4 for ; Sun, 14 Jul 2013 18:15:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from natca.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by legacy7.wa-web.iad1a (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3023A3200B4 for ; Sun, 14 Jul 2013 18:15:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: by webmail.natca.net (Authenticated sender: lalcorn@natca.net, from: lalcorn@natca.net) with HTTP; Sun, 14 Jul 2013 18:15:24 -0400 (EDT) X-Original-Date: Sun, 14 Jul 2013 18:15:24 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Fwd: looking for the meta-message in controller speak From: lalcorn@natca.net X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative;boundary="----=_20130714181524000000_41414" Importance: Normal X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-Type: html X-Original-Message-ID: <1373840124.195716952@webmail.natca.net> X-Mailer: webmail7.0 ------=_20130714181524000000_41414 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable =0APaul, thanks for the kind words. I actually worked you from DBN into JA= X approach over southern Georgia. I did not have much weather to help you = with, but I remember you checking on telling me you were going to spruce cr= eek since DAB was in the flight plan. I know that is an automation issue w= ith our computer and have been trying to get it fixed for a long time.=0A = =0AI did want to comment, that for pilots that are flying IFR it is very he= lpful to know if you have xm/adsb wx or not. I usually put it in the remar= ks sections of my flight plans. That helps us controllers know who needs m= ore help and who has a pretty good picture. Mainly because in the center, = we only see what you see on XM. We, at the center, are looking at nexrad d= ata as well. When you are with approach controls they are looking at their= asr radar weather data, which updates every 6 seconds.=0A =0AThe scott cro= ssfield accident did help push atl center to get better at the weather, but= it was done with a hammer instead of education. Management just beats int= o peoples heads to call weather to every pilot, but still does not teach co= ntrollers how to interpret the weather and more importantly who needs the m= ost help. The delta 757 crew does not need each little piece of precipitat= ion called out to them at 39,000ft. The 182 at 7000 without xm needs more = help. That is still a large piece missing from the faa. There are alot of= new controllers that are not pilots and do not know how to help pilots. T= hey are only beat over the head to call weather. So you will here some peo= ple just say "heavy extreme precipitation along your route of flight", only= to cover themselves legally.=0A =0AThe facilities in the south that do wor= k with thunderstorms more often are better with weather, only because we de= al with it for 70% of the year.=0AStay safe, we're only half way through th= understorm season.=0A =0ALuke Alcorn=0ANATCA ZJX Safety Rep ------=_20130714181524000000_41414 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Paul, than= ks for the kind words.  I actually worked you from DBN into JAX approa= ch over southern Georgia.  I did not have much weather to help you wit= h, but I remember you checking on telling me you were going to spruce creek= since DAB was in the flight plan.  I know that is an automation issue= with our computer and have been trying to get it fixed for a long time.=0A

 

=0A

I did want to comment, that for pilots that are flying IFR it is ve= ry helpful to know if you have xm/adsb wx or not.  I usually put it in= the remarks sections of my flight plans.  That helps us controllers k= now who needs more help and who has a pretty good picture.  Mainly bec= ause in the center, we only see what you see on XM.  We, at the center= , are looking at nexrad data as well.  When you are with approach cont= rols they are looking at their asr radar weather data, which updates every = 6 seconds.

=0A

 

=0A

The scott crossfield accident did help push atl center= to get better at the weather, but it was done with a hammer instead of edu= cation.  Management just beats into peoples heads to call weather to e= very pilot, but still does not teach controllers how to interpret the weath= er and more importantly who needs the most help.  The delta 757 crew d= oes not need each little piece of precipitation called out to them at 39,00= 0ft.  The 182 at 7000 without xm needs more help.  That is still = a large piece missing from the faa.  There are alot of new controllers= that are not pilots and do not know how to help pilots.  They are onl= y beat over the head to call weather.  So you will here some people ju= st say "heavy extreme precipitation along your route of flight", only to co= ver themselves legally.

=0A

 

= =0A

The facilities in the south that do wor= k with thunderstorms more often are better with weather, only because we de= al with it for 70% of the year.

=0A

Stay= safe, we're only half way through thunderstorm season.

=0A

 

=0A=0A

Luke Alcorn
NATCA ZJX Safety Rep

=0A
------=_20130714181524000000_41414--