Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #66012
From: Lancair <lancair-esp@ustek.com>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: RE: [LML] GAMI test
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 12:56:30 -0400
To: <lml@lancaironline.net>

Change that “will send you back” to read “if needed will send you back”. 

For both the IO360 in my GlaStar and the TSIO550 in my ES-P the peaks were so close that GAMI suggested I leave them alone.

 

Robert

ES-P N301ES

 

From: Colyn Case [mailto:colyncase@earthlink.net]
Sent: mercoledė 26 giugno 2013 10.45
To: Lancair Mailing List
Subject: Re: [LML] GAMI test

 

The GAMI test results will be independent of cooling unless something extreme is going on.

You are looking at EGT's not CHT's and you are looking for a peak not an absolute temp.   

They will take your results and send you back new injectors to narrow the gap.

 

On Jun 26, 2013, at 10:34 AM, John Barrett wrote:



I probably know the answer to my question before I ask but I am running my TSIO 550 lean of peak and I want to be sure I am using adequate precautions and am doing the best for the engine.

 

To that end, if my engine baffling is not as good as it could be and I intend to continue to improve it, will a GAMI test now resulting in, say, a 1 gph difference in FF for  peak EGT among the 6 cylinders be useful for me to send to Tornado Alley for GAMIjectors?  In other words, if I improve my baffling after I get George Braly’s fix, will that investment still be relevant?

 

Thanks,

 

John Barrett, CEO

Leading Edge Composites

PO Box 428

Port Hadlock, WA 98339

 

 

 

Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster