X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 11:36:33 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from omr-d09.mx.aol.com ([205.188.108.133] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.5) with ESMTPS id 6349918 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 11:05:45 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.188.108.133; envelope-from=vtailjeff@aol.com Received: from mtaomg-da03.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtaomg-da03.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.51.139]) by omr-d09.mx.aol.com (Outbound Mail Relay) with ESMTP id C29E670083012 for ; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 11:05:09 -0400 (EDT) Received: from core-mna003c.r1000.mail.aol.com (core-mna003.r1000.mail.aol.com [172.29.106.9]) by mtaomg-da03.r1000.mx.aol.com (OMAG/Core Interface) with ESMTP id 8C234E000089 for ; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 11:05:09 -0400 (EDT) References: X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: Re: [LML] GAMI test In-Reply-To: X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI MIME-Version: 1.0 From: vtailjeff@aol.com X-MB-Message-Type: User Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--------MB_8D04095AF07D875_A48_80C30_webmail-d142.sysops.aol.com" X-Mailer: AOL Webmail 37834-STANDARD Received: from 12.110.229.82 by webmail-d142.sysops.aol.com (149.174.18.32) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Wed, 26 Jun 2013 11:05:09 -0400 X-Original-Message-Id: <8D04095AEA3DE8B-A48-22872@webmail-d142.sysops.aol.com> X-Originating-IP: [12.110.229.82] X-Original-Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 11:05:09 -0400 (EDT) x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:472662432:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d338b51cb03251b4b This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ----------MB_8D04095AF07D875_A48_80C30_webmail-d142.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" John, apples and oranges! One is a measure of fuel flow and EGT -- the other, air= flow and CHT. Jeff -----Original Message----- From: John Barrett To: lml Sent: Wed, Jun 26, 2013 9:34 am Subject: [LML] GAMI test I probably know the answer to my question before I ask but I am running my = TSIO 550 lean of peak and I want to be sure I am using adequate precautions= and am doing the best for the engine. =20 To that end, if my engine baffling is not as good as it could be and I inte= nd to continue to improve it, will a GAMI test now resulting in, say, a 1 g= ph difference in FF for peak EGT among the 6 cylinders be useful for me to= send to Tornado Alley for GAMIjectors? In other words, if I improve my ba= ffling after I get George Braly=E2=80=99s fix, will that investment still b= e relevant? =20 Thanks, =20 John Barrett, CEO Leading Edge Composites PO Box 428 Port Hadlock, WA 98339 =20 www.carbinge.com =20 ----------MB_8D04095AF07D875_A48_80C30_webmail-d142.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8"
John,
 
apples and oranges! One is a measure of fuel flow and EGT --= the other, airflow and CHT.
 
Jeff
-----Original Message-----
From: John Barrett <jbarrett@carbinge.com>
To: lml <lml@lancaironline.net>
Sent: Wed, Jun 26, 2013 9:34 am
Subject: [LML] GAMI test

I probably know the answer to my question before I= ask but I am running my TSIO 550 lean of peak and I want to be sure I am u= sing adequate precautions and am doing the best for the engine.
 
To that end, if my engine baffling is not as good = as it could be and I intend to continue to improve it, will a GAMI test now= resulting in, say, a 1 gph difference in FF for  peak EGT among the 6= cylinders be useful for me to send to Tornado Alley for GAMIjectors? = In other words, if I improve my baffling after I get George Braly=E2=80=99= s fix, will that investment still be relevant?
 
Thanks,
 
John Barrett, CEO
Leading Edge Composites
PO Box 428
Port Hadlock, WA 98339
 
 
----------MB_8D04095AF07D875_A48_80C30_webmail-d142.sysops.aol.com--