X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Received: from elasmtp-junco.atl.sa.earthlink.net ([209.86.89.63] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.5) with ESMTP id 6349806 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 10:45:10 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.86.89.63; envelope-from=colyncase@earthlink.net DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=O2+cWuzhoir9GQwaftjCrm1UQPQiAm4Laae0c4xILnQKww5Q7XC+0Qe7NuZU8yVe; h=Received:From:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:To:References:Message-Id:X-Mailer:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP; Received: from [64.223.164.189] (helo=[192.168.1.24]) by elasmtp-junco.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1UrqxX-0008QI-Ke for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 26 Jun 2013 10:44:35 -0400 From: Colyn Case Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-110-961167520 Subject: Re: [LML] GAMI test Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 10:44:34 -0400 In-Reply-To: To: "Lancair Mailing List" References: Message-Id: <23DA58DA-4B5F-49FF-801B-010F0B3EEF7B@earthlink.net> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085) X-ELNK-Trace: 63d5d3452847f8b1d6dd28457998182d7e972de0d01da9402f5cd58d4f53b71c22803c4abb7beefb350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 64.223.164.189 --Apple-Mail-110-961167520 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 The GAMI test results will be independent of cooling unless something = extreme is going on. You are looking at EGT's not CHT's and you are looking for a peak not an = absolute temp. =20 They will take your results and send you back new injectors to narrow = the gap. On Jun 26, 2013, at 10:34 AM, John Barrett wrote: I probably know the answer to my question before I ask but I am running = my TSIO 550 lean of peak and I want to be sure I am using adequate = precautions and am doing the best for the engine. =20 To that end, if my engine baffling is not as good as it could be and I = intend to continue to improve it, will a GAMI test now resulting in, = say, a 1 gph difference in FF for peak EGT among the 6 cylinders be = useful for me to send to Tornado Alley for GAMIjectors? In other words, = if I improve my baffling after I get George Braly=92s fix, will that = investment still be relevant? =20 Thanks, =20 John Barrett, CEO Leading Edge Composites PO Box 428 Port Hadlock, WA 98339 =20 www.carbinge.com =20 --Apple-Mail-110-961167520 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 The GAMI test results will be independent of = cooling unless something extreme is going on.
You are looking at = EGT's not CHT's and you are looking for a peak not an absolute temp. =   
They will take your results and send you back new = injectors to narrow the gap.

On Jun 26, 2013, at = 10:34 AM, John Barrett wrote:

I probably know the answer to = my question before I ask but I am running my TSIO 550 lean of peak and I = want to be sure I am using adequate precautions and am doing the best = for the engine.
 
To that end, if my engine baffling is not as good as it = could be and I intend to continue to improve it, will a GAMI test now = resulting in, say, a 1 gph difference in FF for  peak EGT among the = 6 cylinders be useful for me to send to Tornado Alley for = GAMIjectors?  In other words, if I improve my baffling after I get = George Braly=92s fix, will that investment still be = relevant?
 
Thanks,
 
John Barrett, CEO
Leading Edge = Composites
PO Box 428
Port Hadlock, WA 98339
 
 

<= /html>= --Apple-Mail-110-961167520--