X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 08:32:52 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: <2thman1@gmail.com> Received: from mail-pa0-f43.google.com ([209.85.220.43] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.5) with ESMTPS id 6345228 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 23 Jun 2013 10:06:35 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.220.43; envelope-from=2thman1@gmail.com Received: by mail-pa0-f43.google.com with SMTP id hz11so9932078pad.30 for ; Sun, 23 Jun 2013 07:06:00 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.66.155.102 with SMTP id vv6mr23886614pab.64.1371996359963; Sun, 23 Jun 2013 07:05:59 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-Return-Path: <2thman1@gmail.com> Received: from [192.168.1.109] ([24.56.209.218]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id qe10sm13635199pbb.2.2013.06.23.07.05.58 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 23 Jun 2013 07:05:59 -0700 (PDT) References: In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Original-Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: iPad Mail (10B329) From: John Barrett <2thman1@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [LML] Odyssey Batteries X-Original-Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2013 07:05:55 -0700 X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List I'll chime in too I guess. Am on my second set of two PC 680s. My system sounds like a clone of Fred's= . It has two separate busses, 70 amp alt on one side normally operating at a= bout 36 amps and 20 amp B&C on the other bus and it usually draws about 7 am= ps during cruise flight. X-tie occurs at startup, in any bus failure and ca= n be manually selected. Main difference is mine is controlled automatically= by Vertical Power VP 200. The first set of batteries grew tired due to terrible abuse over several yea= rs in build shops, they were recharged most of the time with older chargers= and were drained and recharged so many times, estimating the number would b= e impossible. =20 I replaced both a bit over a year ago and now use a battery minder that is c= ompatible to the extent that both manuals (battery and charger) reference th= e other brand and indicate the settings to be used. Early in my flight testing program I had plaguing electrical issues that wou= ld frequently kick the electrical to the E bus and often times would even fa= il that. I can't say that necessarily put extra stress on the batteries, bu= t I don't imagine it was particularly good for any part of the system. =20 I was doing a lot of charging last year during the time we were trying to id= entify and solve the problem. That was prior to acquisition of the minder b= ut the batteries were never drained or particularly stressed I don't think. Now the electrical busses are properly balanced so the electrical performs c= orrectly and the batteries seem to be very happy. I still put the minder on= after I run electrical on the ground or leave it for a period of time. The= batteries take up little space on the fire wall and since real estate under= the cowl is precious, that's good. They are relatively light weight so the= re is very little down side to these. I'm all electric so I should develop a= replacement program, but the darn things are so bulletproof I don't know wh= at the cycle should be. Maybe one every two years? Anyone have advice abou= t that? The old Odyssey batteries I took out last year are still around. I tried to= charge one of them and it never reached the charged stage in 24 hours. I'v= e got it on the recondition cycle as of last night and it will be interestin= g to see if it recovers. John Barrett Sent from my iPad On Jun 23, 2013, at 4:41 AM, WAYNE F MARSHALL wrote: >=20 > I love my Odyssey batteries installed in my Legacy. Going strong for 5 yea= rs now. Even if I don't fly for a month because of weather, maintenance or t= ravel, when I return and crank it is like they are brand new! > Wayne Marshall > N54KM >=20 >=20 > -- > For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.htm= l