X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 08:32:52 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: <2thman1@gmail.com> Received: from mail-pb0-f45.google.com ([209.85.160.45] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.5) with ESMTPS id 6345247 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 23 Jun 2013 10:18:06 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.160.45; envelope-from=2thman1@gmail.com Received: by mail-pb0-f45.google.com with SMTP id mc8so9862875pbc.18 for ; Sun, 23 Jun 2013 07:17:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Received: by 10.66.194.13 with SMTP id hs13mr4248335pac.152.1371997050543; Sun, 23 Jun 2013 07:17:30 -0700 (PDT) X-Original-Return-Path: <2thman1@gmail.com> Received: from [192.168.1.109] ([24.56.209.218]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id i16sm15045852pag.18.2013.06.23.07.17.29 for (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Sun, 23 Jun 2013 07:17:29 -0700 (PDT) References: In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-A24433E5-C5E6-493D-BDC9-28359C07D4BC X-Original-Message-Id: Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: iPad Mail (10B329) From: John Barrett <2thman1@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Nose gear check 4P update X-Original-Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2013 07:17:26 -0700 X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List --Apple-Mail-A24433E5-C5E6-493D-BDC9-28359C07D4BC Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable This looks to be repeat of earlier post. My response to Bill was intended t= o demonstrate the dimensions of the bracket extension I used to overcome the= difficulty described by Ralph. Regards, John Sent from my iPad On Jun 23, 2013, at 4:41 AM, wrote: > Bill, John, > =20 > The air pressure inside the cowl wants to open the nose gear door. > =20 > You need a certain momentum to keep the doors closed. It is defined by the= Force of the push rod (it remains the same unless we increase the diameter o= f the nose gear cylinder) x length of the arm > =20 > The length of the arm can be changed by moving the attachment point of the= push rod closer to the center of the airplane (this is what Brent Regan did= if you read my earlier post). > =20 > Unfortunately we can=E2=80=99t move the attachment point completely to the= inside because the nose gear won=E2=80=99t fit in anymore. > =20 > I hope I get to check it out on the weekend. I will make new brackets then= . It will be a bent laser cut aluminum part that can be reproduced at almost= no cost. If I find a sound solution I let you know and I can make the brack= ets for you. > =20 > Ralf > =20 > From: John Barrett [mailto:2thman1@gmail.com]=20 > Sent: Friday, June 21, 2013 10:15 AM > To: lml@lancaironline.net > Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Nose gear check 4P update > =20 > Hi Bill, > =20 > I do vaguely recall that the brackets are either too small or in the wrong= part of the door (per the manual) to get the proper mechanical advantage. I= am thinking Brent Regan came up with the discovery and the advice for fixin= g. It's been a long time, but I think I either made new brackets or put the= m in a different place or both. I could send photos and dimensions if you'd= like. My doors seem to function well although no one has flown formation w= ith me to observe how they close in flight. > =20 > Let me know, > =20 > John >=20 > Sent from my iPad > =20 >=20 > On Jun 19, 2013, at 9:03 PM, "William A. Hogarty" w= rote: >=20 > Hello John: > =20 > Yes, I think that we are talking about the same item > =20 > Each nose gear door is actuated by linkage (rods) that attach to the door u= sing a small "L" shaped aluminum bracket. > =20 > It seem that if the bracket were a little larger, the pivot point (where t= he rod attaches) could be moved and thus apply a little more pressure to ho= ld the doors closed in flight.. > =20 > Any thoughts???? Bill H. > =20 > =20 > =20 >=20 > On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 12:29 AM, John Barrett <2thman1@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi again Bill, > =20 > Is the bracket you are referring to the horn that the push rod is attached= to? =20 > =20 > I'm not quite sure what the bracket is. > =20 > John >=20 > Sent from my iPad > =20 >=20 > On Jun 18, 2013, at 7:09 PM, "William A. Hogarty" w= rote: >=20 > Hello John: > =20 > I bought two replacement aluminum doors from Lancair; primarily because a= luminum hinges are still in the plane and they have always worked well. Dro= pping the doors was a simple matter of pulling the hinge pins. > =20 > I am interested in enlarging the brackets that activate the doors because b= oth of the connecting rods ended up having a slight curve after about 180 ho= urs so there is considerable pressure on those rods. In addition, the right= door bracket had a noticeable bend in it that I would like to resolve. If y= ou have any specs on your brackets, I sure would like to see them > =20 >=20 > On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 9:32 AM, John Barrett <2thman1@gmail.com> wrote: > Hello Bill. =20 > =20 > i made my nose gear doors out of graphite on my LIVP and used Carbinge to h= inge them. Have about 70 hours on the plane now with no glitches. Very hap= py with the results. Can share design parameters if you are interested. =20= > =20 > I also made graphite angle bar to hang them, but that might be overkill wi= th your engine already being mounted. > =20 > Best, > John Barrett > N31VP >=20 > Sent from my iPad > =20 >=20 > On Jun 18, 2013, at 8:46 AM, "William A. Hogarty" w= rote: >=20 > Ralf: > =20 > I am making up a new set of nose gear doors (don't ask).. > =20 > If you fabricate a new door bracket, please let me know the how and what. = And how they work. (maybe Brent has a pattern??? > =20 > Appreciate the help. > =20 > Regards > =20 > Bill Hogarty > =20 > =20 >=20 > On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 4:45 AM, Chris Zavatson = wrote: > Ralf, > The Outback gear doors on the 320/360 suffered a similar fate. The origi= nal actuation scheme couldn't handle the air loads. A small pressure differ= ential over a large area generates a lot of force. > Chris > =20 > Chris Zavatson > N91CZ > 360std > www.N91CZ.net > =20 > From: "bronnenmeier@GROBSYSTEMS.COM" > To: lml@lancaironline.net=20 > Sent: Monday, June 17, 2013 11:08 AM > Subject: [LML] Nose gear check 4P update >=20 > Dear subscribers, >=20 > I did the nose gear check as described Jack Morgan and Charlie Kohler > earlier. Everything went very smooth and the plane did not move at all > even when the weight on the tail and chucks were removed. >=20 > I cycled the gear 5 times and every time the nose gear door shut > perfect. This leads to the conclusion that my door shuts perfect after > take-off and reopens due to air-pressure like Brent Regan describes > below. >=20 > On the in-flight picture you can see how the door gets pushed open. This > was at a pretty low speed - approx. 140...150 kts indicated - I assume > it will get worse if I go faster. >=20 > I attached pics of my nose gear linkage versus Brent Regan's improved > nose gear linkage - if yours looks more like mine you probably have the > same problem. >=20 > Since there was so much concern about my jacks I attached a pic of the > gear check. My jacks work reliable and the plane sits sound on them. > They just don't have enough stroke. That's why I have little platforms > that I slide in and out. The set up works reliable - it is just a little > more work....=20 >=20 > Ralf >=20 >=20 >=20 > -----Original Message----- > From: Brent Regan [mailto:brent@regandesigns.com]=20 > Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2013 11:37 AM > To: Lancair Mailing List > Subject: Re: Nose gear check 4P >=20 > Ralf writes: > "A friend took a picture of the belly of my airplane in flight with the > gear up. It looked to me that the nose gear door was not completely > closed." >=20 > The original factory nose gear door linkage geometry provided too low a > mechanical advantage to keep the doors closed against the internal > cowling air pressure during flight. On the door bracket, you need to > fabricate a new part with the link ball hole rotated about the hinge > centerline towards the AC center. This will give a larger effective > moment arm when the doors are closed. A slight kink in the linkage arms > is required. See pictures attached. >=20 > BTW, Selecting Gear Up while on the wheels is an incredibly bad idea.=20 > Buy a decent pair of jacks NOW. Also, do NOT strap the spinner to lift > the nose. Remove the top cowl and strap the propshaft. >=20 > Regards > Bren Regan > -- > For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.htm= l >=20 >=20 > =20 > =20 > =20 > > -- > For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.htm= l --Apple-Mail-A24433E5-C5E6-493D-BDC9-28359C07D4BC Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
This looks to be repeat of earlier pos= t.  My response to Bill was intended to demonstrate the dimensions of t= he bracket extension I used to overcome the difficulty described by Ralph.

Regards,
John

Sent from my iPad

On Jun 23, 2013, at 4:41 AM, <bronnenmeier@GROBSYSTEMS.COM> wrote:

Bill, John,

 

The air pressure inside the cowl w= ants to open the nose gear door.

 

You need a certain momentum to keep the doors cl= osed. It is defined by the Force of the push rod (it remains the same unless= we increase the diameter of the nose gear cylinder) x length of the arm

&nbs= p;

The leng= th of the arm can be changed by moving the attachment point of the push rod c= loser to the center of the airplane (this is what Brent Regan did if you rea= d my earlier post).

 

Unfortunately we can=E2=80=99t move the attachment point complet= ely to the inside because the nose gear won=E2=80=99t fit in anymore.

 <= /o:p>

I hope I ge= t to check it out on the weekend. I will make new brackets then. It will be a= bent laser cut aluminum part that can be reproduced at almost no cost. If I= find a sound solution I let you know and I can make the brackets for you.

&n= bsp;

Ralf

&n= bsp;

From:= John Barrett [ma= ilto:2thman1@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, June 21, 2013 10:15 AM<= br>To: lml@lancaironline.net=
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Nose gear check 4P update

 

Hi Bill,

 

I do vaguely recall tha= t the brackets are either too small or in the wrong part of the door (per th= e manual) to get the proper mechanical advantage.  I am thinking Brent R= egan came up with the discovery and the advice for fixing.  It's been a= long time, but I think I either made new brackets or put them in a differen= t place or both.  I could send photos and dimensions if you'd like. &nb= sp;My doors seem to function well although no one has flown formation with m= e to observe how they close in flight.

 

Let me kno= w,

 

John

Sent from my iPad

 


On Jun 19, 2013, at 9:03 PM, "= William A. Hogarty" <billhogarty= @gmail.com> wrote:

Hello Joh= n:

 

Yes, I think that we are talking about the sam= e item

 

=

Each nose gear door is actuated by linkage= (rods) that attach to the door using a small "L" shaped aluminum = bracket.

 

It seem that if the bracket were a littl= e larger, the pivot point (where the rod attaches) could be moved a= nd thus apply  a little more pressure to hold the doors closed in fligh= t..

 

Any thoughts????  Bill H.

=

 

          &nbs= p;

 

On Wed, Jun 19= , 2013 at 12:29 AM, John Barrett <2thman1@gmail.com> wrote:

Hi again Bill,

 

Is the bracket y= ou are referring to the horn that the push rod is attached to?  

 

I'm not quite sure what the bracket is.

<= /div>

 

John

Sent from my iPad

 


On Jun 18, 2013, at 7:09 PM, "William A= . Hogarty" <bi= llhogarty@gmail.com> wrote:

= Hello John:

 

I bought two replacement aluminum doo= rs from Lancair;  primarily because aluminum hinges are still in the pl= ane and they have always worked well.  Dropping the doors was a simple m= atter of pulling the hinge pins.

 

I am interested i= n enlarging the brackets that activate the doors because both of the connect= ing rods ended up having a slight curve after about 180 hours so there is co= nsiderable pressure on those rods.  In addition, the right door bracket= had a noticeable bend in it that I would like to resolve.  If you have= any specs on your brackets, I sure would like to see them

&nb= sp;

On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 at 9:32 AM, Jo= hn Barrett <2thman= 1@gmail.com> wrote:

He= llo Bill.  

 =

i made my nose gear doors out of= graphite on my LIVP and used Carbinge to hinge them.  Have about 70 ho= urs on the plane now with no glitches.  Very happy with the results. &n= bsp;Can share design parameters if you are interested.  

=

 

I also made graphite angle bar to hang them, but that might be o= verkill with your engine already being mounted.

 

Be= st,

John Barrett<= /p>

N31VP

Sent from my iPad

 


On Jun 18, 2= 013, at 8:46 AM, "William A. Hogarty" <billhogarty@gmail.com> wrote:

=
<= div>

Ralf:

 

I am making up a= new set of nose gear doors (don't ask)..

 

If you= fabricate a new door bracket, please let me know the how and what.  An= d how they work. (maybe Brent has a pattern???

 

Ap= preciate the help.

 

Regards

 

Bill Hogarty

 

 

On Tue, Jun 18, 2013 a= t 4:45 AM, Chris Zavatson <chris_zavatson@yahoo.com> wrote:

<= div>

Ralf,

The Outback gear doors on the 320/360 suffered a similar fate.  = ; The original actuation scheme couldn't handle the air loads.  A small= pressure differential over a large area generates a lot of force.

Chris

 

Chri= s Zavatson

N91CZ<= /span>

360std

 

From: "bronnenmeier@GROBSYSTEMS.COM<= /a>" <b= ronnenmeier@GROBSYSTEMS.COM>
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Sent: M= onday, June 17, 2013 11:08 AM
Subject: [LML] Nose gear check 4P up= date


Dear subscribers,

I did the nose gear check as des= cribed Jack Morgan and Charlie Kohler
earlier. Everything went very smoot= h and the plane did not move at all
even when the weight on the tail and c= hucks were removed.

I cycled the gear 5 times and every time the nose= gear door shut
perfect. This leads to the conclusion that my door shuts p= erfect after
take-off and reopens due to air-pressure like Brent Regan de= scribes
below.

On the in-flight picture you can see how the door g= ets pushed open. This
was at a pretty low speed - approx.  140...150= kts indicated - I assume
it will get worse if I go faster.

I atta= ched pics of my nose gear linkage versus Brent Regan's improved
nose gear= linkage - if yours looks more like mine you probably have the
same probl= em.

Since there was so much concern about my jacks I attached a pic o= f the
gear check. My jacks work reliable and the plane sits sound on them= .
They just don't have enough stroke. That's why I have little platforms<= br>that I slide in and out. The set up works reliable - it is just a little<= br>more work....

Ralf



-----Original Message-----
From:= Brent Regan [mailto:brent@regandesigns.com]
Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2013 11:37 AM=
To: Lancair Mailing List
Subject: Re: Nose gear check 4P

Ralf w= rites:
"A friend took a picture of the belly of my airplane in flight wit= h the
gear up. It looked to me that the nose gear door was not completely=
closed."

The original factory nose gear door linkage geometry pro= vided too low a
mechanical advantage to keep the doors closed against the= internal
cowling air pressure during flight. On the door bracket, you ne= ed to
fabricate a new part with the link ball hole rotated about the hing= e
centerline towards the AC center. This will give a larger effective
= moment arm when the doors are closed. A slight kink in the linkage arms
i= s required. See pictures attached.

BTW, Selecting Gear Up while on th= e wheels is an incredibly bad idea.
Buy a decent pair of jacks NOW. Also= , do NOT strap the spinner to lift
the nose. Remove the top cowl and stra= p the propshaft.

Regards
Bren Regan
--
For archives and unsu= b http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html

=  

 

=

 

<= /div>
<SKMBT_C3601306221= 0570.pdf>
= --Apple-Mail-A24433E5-C5E6-493D-BDC9-28359C07D4BC--