X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 08:32:51 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from cdptpa-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([75.180.132.120] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.5) with ESMTP id 6345468 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 23 Jun 2013 15:34:40 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=75.180.132.120; envelope-from=tednoel@cfl.rr.com X-Original-Return-Path: X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.0 cv=Ev5QXFgA c=1 sm=0 a=3ojic4p/4/GFVLdSTBAvnw==:17 a=lPzcwwf0IO0A:10 a=nWZo5VSqEgYA:10 a=05ChyHeVI94A:10 a=ayC55rCoAAAA:8 a=KGjhK52YXX0A:10 a=5qvijt6QSCIA:10 a=oCcaPWc0AAAA:8 a=hNUOy_Uy2zYElXUNohsA:9 a=wPNLvfGTeEIA:10 a=4PR2P7QzAAAA:8 a=sztrgN8JczN4CLDFxAwA:9 a=UiCQ7L4-1S4A:10 a=hTZeC7Yk6K0A:10 a=_W_S_7VecoQA:10 a=frz4AuCg-hUA:10 a=djSSOgbfo6cA:10 a=H8BGqXk5yWccuR6W:21 a=3ojic4p/4/GFVLdSTBAvnw==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Authenticated-User: X-Originating-IP: 184.91.178.101 Received: from [184.91.178.101] ([184.91.178.101:50160] helo=[192.168.1.5]) by cdptpa-oedge01.mail.rr.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.46 r()) with ESMTP id D3/2C-06197-DAD47C15; Sun, 23 Jun 2013 19:34:05 +0000 X-Original-Message-ID: <51C74D8C.70002@cfl.rr.com> X-Original-Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2013 15:33:32 -0400 From: Ted Noel Reply-To: tednoel@cfl.rr.com User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List Subject: Re: [LML] Power for ES References: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------010808050502090009080706" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --------------010808050502090009080706 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Talk to Marv at DiMech Turbines. They have a project in the works that may be a perfect fit for you. Ted Noel On 6/23/2013 7:41 AM, Ed Gray wrote: > > Just starting on our ES fastbuild, so 2 or 3 years away from engine > decision. Love the concept of the Deltahawk 200 hp. They say they > are 1-2 years away from cert. engines, experimental sooner. 200 hp > should be plenty for takeoff, since much more torque available, and > the 200 is there all the way up to flight levels. Fuel savings in > 2000 hours will pay for the engine, plus no worries about 100 LL. > Anyone else looking at this engine? Ed Gray > > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 2013.0.3345 / Virus Database: 3199/6434 - Release Date: 06/23/13 > --------------010808050502090009080706 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Talk to Marv at DiMech Turbines. They have a project in the works that may be a perfect fit for you.

Ted Noel

On 6/23/2013 7:41 AM, Ed Gray wrote:

Just starting on our ES fastbuild, so 2 or 3 years away from engine decision.  Love the concept of the Deltahawk 200 hp.  They say they are 1-2 years away from cert. engines, experimental sooner.  200 hp should be plenty for takeoff, since much more torque available, and the 200 is there all the way up to flight levels.  Fuel savings in 2000 hours will pay for the engine, plus no worries about 100 LL.  Anyone else looking at this engine?  Ed Gray

No virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2013.0.3345 / Virus Database: 3199/6434 - Release Date: 06/23/13


--------------010808050502090009080706--