X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 12:35:15 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mout.gmx.net ([74.208.4.200] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 6.0.2) with ESMTP id 6122762 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 11:21:59 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=74.208.4.200; envelope-from=cfi@instructor.net Received: from mailout-us.mail.com ([172.19.198.94]) by mrigmx.server.lan (mrigmxus001) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MCcwI-1UOjuI37PG-009NMd for ; Fri, 15 Mar 2013 16:21:24 +0100 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 15 Mar 2013 15:21:24 -0000 Received: from mobile-166-147-117-002.mycingular.net (EHLO [10.47.2.237]) [166.147.117.2] by mail.gmx.com (mp-us011) with SMTP; 15 Mar 2013 11:21:24 -0400 X-Authenticated: #73491717 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1+X1EA84xWXAOgsyBSyE7R+eyuV2zb9YtoiKjTrcf Oe3toKgie6LQV5 Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Pressurization References: From: Ron Galbraith Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (10B146) In-Reply-To: X-Original-Message-Id: X-Original-Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2013 11:21:22 -0400 X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 Another question regarding the vacuum port on the outflow valve. If there i= s no pump on it, does the port need to be capped off or open? =20 Working on a new IVP that won't pressurize. =20 Ron Sent from my iPhone On Mar 14, 2013, at 5:11 PM, Todd Long wrote: > The pump seems way too=20