Return-Path: Received: from inc.net ([204.95.160.26]) by ns1.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.5.3 release 223 ID# 0-64832U3500L350S0V35) with ESMTP id com for ; Mon, 14 Aug 2000 09:41:24 -0400 Received: from mail.firstar.com (mail.firstar.com [207.250.44.193]) by inc.net (8.9.3/8.9.1) with SMTP id IAA10252 for ; Mon, 14 Aug 2000 08:47:48 -0500 (CDT) Received: from brkfld_domino by mail.firstar.com via smtpd (for mailhost.inc.net [204.95.160.26]) with SMTP; 14 Aug 2000 13:47:50 UT Received: by mail.firstar.com(Lotus SMTP MTA v4.6.5 (863.2 5-20-1999)) id 8625693B.004BEAFF ; Mon, 14 Aug 2000 08:49:13 -0500 From: Theo_Green@firstar.com To: lancair.list@olsusa.com Message-ID: <8625693B.004BE8EB.00@mail.firstar.com> Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2000 08:49:30 -0500 Subject: RE: exhaust backpressure X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Reply-To: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Sorry for the late post, but backing up many of Brent's points. I posed the question to a friend who is a managing engineer at Harley-Davidson's test division. Here is the reply: There are some differing theories on all of this and I believe most of it is application and engine specific, not generalities. For example, just crushing the end of the pipe to an unknown oval will probably net you a goose egg in performance (i.e. 0 net performance improvement.) However, there are a number of exhaust manufacturers who have gone to great lengths to prove an ellipse is the best shape, of course size and cord length etc. is very important. Many calculations/theories/testing/$$$$ behind all that. We spent quite a bit of time and $$/research developing cross over pipes to equalize pressure cylinder to cylinder on our V-Twins for the purpose of improving horsepower. In fact it is a common misconception that our exhaust systems are extremely restrictive compared to after market pipes/systems. What we lose in noise we gain in improved scavenging capability and reducing back flow due to restrictions etc. blah, blah, blah. Bottom line is there is a tremendous amount of science that goes into an exhaust system, size, shape, length, intake design, valve placement, port flow, port size, port shape, etc. that goes into these systems. There is no one correct answer either. Just adding our cross over added almost 15 horse to our bikes! Generally speaking though, if you are after horsepower at top speed, big pipes, with crossovers rule. If you are after low end torque, then smaller (to a point) pipes with crossovers rule. Where the cross over is added by the way is also important. Old "big three" muscle car's always had a cross over, usually behind the tranny. These seemed to have been more important with stock exhausts than with after market though? However, I do not hear of a cross over ever hurting. Nor have I ever heard of an elliptical or oval shaped output ever hurt? Bottom line is it would probably not hurt to put in a cross over and change the outlet shape. I just remembered there is a company that is producing elliptical tubes for their system as well. Good luck with the choice! >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> LML website: http://www.olsusa.com/Users/Mkaye/maillist.html LML Builders' Bookstore: http://www.buildersbooks.com/lancair Please send your photos and drawings to marvkaye@olsusa.com. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>