|
I would be willing to bet that experimentals do more than 15 percent of the flight hours which would help our ratio. I would like to see a statistic for accidents per flight hour for both general aviation and experimentals. I would guess they are pretty close...
Randy Snarr
N694RS
Sent from my iPhone
On May 28, 2012, at 11:17 AM, vtailjeff@aol.com wrote:
> Please read the rest of the report. The fatal experimental accident rate is two to four times as great as the comparison GA certified aircraft fatal rate.
>
> Jeff
>
> Sent from my iPad
>
> On May 26, 2012, at 2:34 PM, Lorn H Olsen <lorn@dynacomm.us> wrote:
>
>> 224,000 / 33,000 = 15%
>>
>> 15% of the fleet, 20% of the accidents. Not bad, not bad at all.
>>
>>
>> On May 25, 2012, at 6:00 AM, Lancair Mailing List wrote:
>>
>>> Among 224,000 general-aviation aircraft across the USA, 33,000 are considered experimental, meaning they were built from a kit or from a unique design. The aircraft account for 20% of fatal crashes of general aviation, despite representing a small portion of the fleet.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Lorn H. 'Feathers' Olsen, MAA, ASMEL, ASES, Comm, Inst
>> DynaComm, Corp., 248-345-0500, mailto:lorn@dynacomm.us
>> LNC2, FB90/92, O-320-D1F, 1,800 hrs, N31161, Y47, SE Michigan
>>
>>
>> --
>> For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html
>
> --
> For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html
|
|