|
all of the goofy stuff was deleted from the study
-----Original Message-----
From: Sky2high <Sky2high@aol.com>
To: lml <lml@lancaironline.net>
Sent: Tue, May 29, 2012 10:09 am
Subject: [LML] Re: Experimental Aircraft Accidents
Let's also remember that "experimental" also includes really goofy stuff - auto gyros, heavy ultra lights, strange amphibs, weird wooden contraptions, GA test aircraft, war birds, etc.
Grayhawk
Uh, Lancairians could do better.........
In a message dated 5/28/2012 12:17:17 P.M. Central Daylight Time, vtailjeff@aol.com writes:
Please read the rest of the report. The fatal experimental accident rate is two to four times as great as the comparison GA certified aircraft fatal rate.
Jeff
Sent from my iPad
On May 26, 2012, at 2:34 PM, Lorn H Olsen <lorn@dynacomm.us> wrote:
> 224,000 / 33,000 = 15%
>
> 15% of the fleet, 20% of the accidents. Not bad, not bad at all.
>
>
> On May 25, 2012, at 6:00 AM, Lancair Mailing List wrote:
>
>> Among 224,000 general-aviation aircraft across the USA, 33,000 are considered experimental, meaning they were built from a kit or from a unique design. The aircraft account for 20% of fatal crashes of general aviation, despite representing a small portion of the fleet.
>
>
> --
> Lorn H. 'Feathers' Olsen, MAA, ASMEL, ASES, Comm, Inst
> DynaComm, Corp., 248-345-0500, mailto:lorn@dynacomm.us
> LNC2, FB90/92, O-320-D1F, 1,800 hrs, N31161, Y47, SE Michigan
>
>
> --
> For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html
--
For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html
|
|