X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 13:09:41 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imr-ma06.mx.aol.com ([64.12.78.142] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.5) with ESMTP id 5565854 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 29 May 2012 11:27:46 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=64.12.78.142; envelope-from=vtailjeff@aol.com Received: from mtaomg-da04.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtaomg-da04.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.51.140]) by imr-ma06.mx.aol.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q4TFQuEt008715 for ; Tue, 29 May 2012 11:26:56 -0400 Received: from core-mnc002a.r1000.mail.aol.com (core-mnc002.r1000.mail.aol.com [172.29.106.197]) by mtaomg-da04.r1000.mx.aol.com (OMAG/Core Interface) with ESMTP id 65FABE0000A7 for ; Tue, 29 May 2012 11:26:56 -0400 (EDT) References: X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Experimental Aircraft Accidents In-Reply-To: X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI MIME-Version: 1.0 From: vtailjeff@aol.com X-MB-Message-Type: User Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--------MB_8CF0BC69D2EC66E_1FE0_3764D_webmail-stg-d15.sysops.aol.com" X-Mailer: AOL Webmail 36210-STANDARD Received: from 75.56.140.159 by webmail-stg-d15.sysops.aol.com (205.188.185.231) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Tue, 29 May 2012 11:26:55 -0400 X-Original-Message-Id: <8CF0BC69CBC843E-1FE0-CDB7@webmail-stg-d15.sysops.aol.com> X-Originating-IP: [75.56.140.159] X-Original-Date: Tue, 29 May 2012 11:26:56 -0400 (EDT) x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:470060384:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d338c4fc4eac07efc This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ----------MB_8CF0BC69D2EC66E_1FE0_3764D_webmail-stg-d15.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" all of the goofy stuff was deleted from the study -----Original Message----- From: Sky2high To: lml Sent: Tue, May 29, 2012 10:09 am Subject: [LML] Re: Experimental Aircraft Accidents Let's also remember that "experimental" also includes really goofy stuff - = auto gyros, heavy ultra lights, strange amphibs, weird wooden contraptions,= GA test aircraft, war birds, etc. =20 Grayhawk =20 Uh, Lancairians could do better......... =20 In a message dated 5/28/2012 12:17:17 P.M. Central Daylight Time, vtailjeff= @aol.com writes: Please read the rest of the report. The fatal experimental accident rate is= two to four times as great as the comparison GA certified aircraft fatal r= ate.=20 Jeff Sent from my iPad On May 26, 2012, at 2:34 PM, Lorn H Olsen wrote: > 224,000 / 33,000 =3D 15% >=20 > 15% of the fleet, 20% of the accidents. Not bad, not bad at all. >=20 >=20 > On May 25, 2012, at 6:00 AM, Lancair Mailing List wrote: >=20 >> Among 224,000 general-aviation aircraft across the USA, 33,000 are consi= dered experimental, meaning they were built from a kit or from a unique des= ign. The aircraft account for 20% of fatal crashes of general aviation, des= pite representing a small portion of the fleet. >=20 >=20 > -- > Lorn H. 'Feathers' Olsen, MAA, ASMEL, ASES, Comm, Inst > DynaComm, Corp., 248-345-0500, mailto:lorn@dynacomm.us > LNC2, FB90/92, O-320-D1F, 1,800 hrs, N31161, Y47, SE Michigan >=20 >=20 > -- > For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.ht= ml -- For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html ----------MB_8CF0BC69D2EC66E_1FE0_3764D_webmail-stg-d15.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii"
all of the goofy stuff was= deleted from the study

 
= -----Original Message-----
From: Sky2high <Sky2high@aol.com>
To: lml <lml@lancaironline.net>
Sent: Tue, May 29, 2012 10:09 am
Subject: [LML] Re: Experimental Aircraft Accidents

Let's also remember that "experimental" also includes really goofy stu= ff - auto gyros, heavy ultra lights, strange amphibs, weird wooden contrapt= ions, GA test aircraft, war birds, etc.
 
Grayhawk
 
Uh, Lancairians could do better.........
 
In a message dated 5/28/2012 12:17:17 P.M. Central Daylight Time, vtailjeff@aol.com writes:
Please read the rest of the report. The fatal experime= ntal accident rate is two to four times as great as the comparison GA certi= fied aircraft fatal rate.

Jeff

Sent from my iPad

On May 26, 2012, at 2:34 PM, Lorn H Olsen <lorn@dynacomm.us> wrote:

> 224,000 / 33,000 =3D 15%
>
> 15% of the fleet, 20% of the accidents. Not bad, not bad at all.
>
>
> On May 25, 2012, at 6:00 AM, Lancair Mailing List wrote:
>
>> Among 224,000 general-aviation aircraft across the USA, 33,000 are= considered experimental, meaning they were built from a kit or from a uniq= ue design. The aircraft account for 20% of fatal crashes of general aviatio= n, despite representing a small portion of the fleet.
>
>
> --
> Lorn H. 'Feathers' Olsen, MAA, ASMEL, ASES, Comm, Inst
> DynaComm, Corp., 248-345-0500, ma= ilto:lorn@dynacomm.us
> LNC2, FB90/92, O-320-D1F, 1,800 hrs, N31161, Y47, SE Michigan
>
>
> --
> For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lm= l/List.html

--
For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/Lis= t.html
----------MB_8CF0BC69D2EC66E_1FE0_3764D_webmail-stg-d15.sysops.aol.com--