X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 20:55:46 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from snt0-omc3-s36.snt0.hotmail.com ([65.55.90.175] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.4) with ESMTP id 5483358 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 16 Apr 2012 11:39:20 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=65.55.90.175; envelope-from=scottekeighan@sympatico.ca Received: from SNT129-W12 ([65.55.90.135]) by snt0-omc3-s36.snt0.hotmail.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Mon, 16 Apr 2012 08:38:43 -0700 X-Original-Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: scottekeighan@sympatico.ca Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_93d9f865-4e8a-43de-8e4f-13f9d495fb46_" X-Originating-IP: [207.236.24.137] From: Scott E Keighan X-Original-To: Subject: RE: [LML] Re: Hartzell prop shim on Legacy X-Original-Date: Mon, 16 Apr 2012 15:38:42 +0000 Importance: Normal In-Reply-To: References: MIME-Version: 1.0 X-OriginalArrivalTime: 16 Apr 2012 15:38:43.0168 (UTC) FILETIME=[00FE6600:01CD1BE7] --_93d9f865-4e8a-43de-8e4f-13f9d495fb46_ Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Why not just add a small spacer to the engine mount at the firewall. This= would put the whole engine assembly forward a little bit giving you more space at= the cowl. After all you probably only need about 1/8 to 3/16 of an inch or so. =20 Scott Keighan LIV 160hrs =20 To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon=2C 16 Apr 2012 08:13:56 -0400 From: Sky2high@aol.com Subject: [LML] Re: Hartzell prop shim on Legacy Paul=2C =20 You could consider a plate between the crankshaft flange and the prop. How= ever=2C that might change the dynamic vibration and its harmonics? Seek ad= vice from Hartzell. =20 Can the rear of the spinner be shaved without reducing structural integrity= ? =20 Scott Krueger =20 In a message dated 4/13/2012 11:02:43 P.M. Central Daylight Time=2C pjdmill= er@gmail.com writes: I'm running out of options for a little extra clearance between the front o= f the cowl and the prop spinner. Is there any way to add shims to a Hartz= ell prop on the IO-550 to extend the clearance? Paul=20 Spruce Creek=20 Legacy RG -- For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html= = --_93d9f865-4e8a-43de-8e4f-13f9d495fb46_ Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

 =3BWhy not just add a small spacer to the engine mount at the fire= wall. =3B This would
put the whole engine assembly forward a little bit giving you more space at= the cowl.
After all you probably only need about =3B1/8 to 3/16 of an inch or so.=
 =3B
Scott Keighan
LIV 160hrs
 =3B
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Mon=2C 16 Apr 2012 08:13:56 -0400
Fro= m: Sky2high@aol.com
Subject: [LML] Re: Hartzell prop shim on Legacy
<= BR>
Paul=2C
 =3B
You could consider a plate between the crankshaft flange and the prop.=  =3B However=2C that might change the dynamic vibration and its harmoni= cs? =3B Seek advice from Hartzell.
 =3B
Can the rear of the spinner be shaved without reducing structural inte= grity?
 =3B
Scott Krueger
 =3B
In a message dated 4/13/2012 11:02:43 P.M. Central Daylight Time=2C pj= dmiller@gmail.com writes:
I'm running out of options for a little extra clea= rance between the front of the cowl and the prop spinner. =3B =3B I= s there any way to add shims to a Hartzell prop on the IO-550 to extend the= clearance?

Paul
Spruce Creek
Legacy RG
--
For archive= s and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html
= --_93d9f865-4e8a-43de-8e4f-13f9d495fb46_--