X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 13:07:36 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from raven.ravenwebhosting.com ([72.9.254.67] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.4) with ESMTPS id 5402034 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 09:05:50 -0500 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=72.9.254.67; envelope-from=paul@tbm700.com Received: from 103-57.202-68.tampabay.res.rr.com ([68.202.57.103]:61518 helo=[192.168.15.108]) by raven.ravenwebhosting.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RyOQz-0007Rp-RY for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 17 Feb 2012 09:05:14 -0500 From: paul miller Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-43--1007007350 Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Boulder Colorado Area Hangar Advice? X-Original-Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2012 09:05:10 -0500 In-Reply-To: X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" References: X-Original-Message-Id: <0C3FCC74-EA97-4BE4-A897-4AAE7D558B88@tbm700.com> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - raven.ravenwebhosting.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - lancaironline.net X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - tbm700.com X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: --Apple-Mail-43--1007007350 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 A few times this summer I've flown into Boulder and it is a friendly = airport, good location. They started paving the ramp which was in = terrible shape. I personally wouldn't mind having the city acquire the = hangar in 20 years if I had an option to lease. Perhaps that is a = workable deal to stay in Boulder. Paul Spruce Creek On 2012-02-17, at 8:55 AM, Valin & Allyson Thorn wrote: > Hi Art, > =20 > I=92ve heard a lot of good things about the Front Range Airport. = Unfortunately, we live in Boulder and it=92s a pretty long drive out = there. Since we=92re still building and need to be in the hangar often = it makes a long drive even more of a problem. Thanks for the feedback = on the Longmont airport problems. The Boulder airport is closest, of = course, but we=92d have to build a new hangar and the city=92s terms are = that they own it in 20 years. Explains why it=92s not thriving like = the other nearby airports=85=20 > =20 > Thanks for the help. > =20 > Valin --Apple-Mail-43--1007007350 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 A few = times this summer I've flown into Boulder and it is a friendly airport, = good location. They started paving the ramp which was in terrible = shape. I personally wouldn't mind having the city acquire the hangar in = 20 years if I had an option to lease. Perhaps that is a workable = deal to stay in Boulder.

Paul

Spruce = Creek

On 2012-02-17, at 8:55 AM, Valin & Allyson Thorn = wrote:

Hi = Art,
I=92ve heard a = lot of good things about the Front Range Airport. Unfortunately, we = live in Boulder and it=92s a pretty long drive out = there. Since we=92re still = building and need to be in the hangar often it makes a long drive even = more of a problem. Thanks for the = feedback on the Longmont airport problems. The Boulder airport = is closest, of course, but we=92d have to build a new hangar and the = city=92s terms are that they own it in 20 years. Expl= ains why it=92s not thriving like the other nearby = airports=85

Thanks for the = help.