X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 06:27:26 -0500 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imr-da01.mx.aol.com ([205.188.105.143] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.3) with ESMTP id 5354049 for lml@lancaironline.net; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 15:46:53 -0500 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.188.105.143; envelope-from=vtailjeff@aol.com Received: from mtaomg-mb05.r1000.mx.aol.com (mtaomg-mb05.r1000.mx.aol.com [172.29.41.76]) by imr-da01.mx.aol.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id q0HKkDj0016535 for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 15:46:13 -0500 Received: from core-mnc001b.r1000.mail.aol.com (core-mnc001.r1000.mail.aol.com [172.29.106.193]) by mtaomg-mb05.r1000.mx.aol.com (OMAG/Core Interface) with ESMTP id 7C50EE00008F for ; Tue, 17 Jan 2012 15:46:13 -0500 (EST) References: X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: Re: [LML] aopa turbine numbers: $ vs safety In-Reply-To: X-MB-Message-Source: WebUI MIME-Version: 1.0 From: vtailjeff@aol.com X-MB-Message-Type: User Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="--------MB_8CEA3702F7C7F20_EAC_1125B_webmail-d075.sysops.aol.com" X-Mailer: AOL Webmail 35138-STANDARD Received: from 75.33.124.13 by webmail-d075.sysops.aol.com (205.188.181.101) with HTTP (WebMailUI); Tue, 17 Jan 2012 15:46:13 -0500 X-Original-Message-Id: <8CEA3702F6E36C8-EAC-478B@webmail-d075.sysops.aol.com> X-Originating-IP: [75.33.124.13] X-Original-Date: Tue, 17 Jan 2012 15:46:13 -0500 (EST) x-aol-global-disposition: G X-AOL-SCOLL-SCORE: 0:2:431556128:93952408 X-AOL-SCOLL-URL_COUNT: 0 x-aol-sid: 3039ac1d294c4f15de155fea This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ----------MB_8CEA3702F7C7F20_EAC_1125B_webmail-d075.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" one is being installed in an Evo -----Original Message----- From: William Miller To: lml Sent: Tue, Jan 17, 2012 10:57 am Subject: [LML] aopa turbine numbers: $ vs safety Catching up on some reading, I noticed the survey of turbine aircraft in th= e AOPA Pilot June, 2011. I certainly is a lot of fun to compare my fuel flo= w, cost per hour, maintenance, range, fixed costs, and payload to their num= bers. Some manufacturers don't even publish their fuel flow with the cruise= data. I wonder what that could mean? Now, if we can just organize ourselves to match their safety record.... m= y airplane is missing a few of the certified(or USNmilspec) requirements, i= ncluding egress and escape redundancy, fire detection/suppression/preventio= n, and "more successful" complete engine failure procedures.(multi-,BRS,eje= ct, bail) I know of one installation of the BRS chute in an ES. Has anyone else inst= alled one? Bill Miller IV-P's 450 +45 ----------MB_8CEA3702F7C7F20_EAC_1125B_webmail-d075.sysops.aol.com Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" one is being installed in an Evo


= -----Original Message-----
From: William Miller <cwfmd@yahoo.com>
To: lml <lml@lancaironline.net>
Sent: Tue, Jan 17, 2012 10:57 am
Subject: [LML] aopa turbine numbers: $ vs safety

Catching up on some reading, I noticed the survey of turbine aircraft = in the AOPA Pilot June, 2011. I certainly is a lot of fun to compare my fue= l flow, cost per hour, maintenance, range, fixed costs, and payload to= their numbers. Some manufacturers don't even publish their fuel flow with = the cruise data. I wonder what that could mean?
 Now, if we can just organize ourselves to match their safety rec= ord....  my airplane is missing a few of the certified(or USNmilspec)&= nbsp;requirements, including egress and escape redundancy, fire detection/s= uppression/prevention, and "more successful" complete engine= failure procedures.(multi-,BRS,eject, bail)
 I know of one installation of the BRS chute in an ES. Has anyone= else installed one?
Bill Miller
IV-P's  450 +45
----------MB_8CEA3702F7C7F20_EAC_1125B_webmail-d075.sysops.aol.com--