X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To:  lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2011 08:12:49 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-5180982@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <dave.saylor.aircrafters@gmail.com>
Received: from mail-ey0-f180.google.com ([209.85.215.180] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.2)
  with ESMTPS id 5180197 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 17:07:40 -0400
Received-SPF: pass
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.85.215.180; envelope-from=dave.saylor.aircrafters@gmail.com
Received: by eyg5 with SMTP id 5so6102478eyg.25
        for <lml@lancaironline.net>; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 14:07:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.14.17.79 with SMTP id i55mr1353266eei.230.1320095225094; Mon,
 31 Oct 2011 14:07:05 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.14.127.202 with HTTP; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 14:06:24 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <list-5180153@logan.com>
References: <list-5180153@logan.com>
From: Dave Saylor <dave.saylor.aircrafters@gmail.com>
X-Original-Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 14:06:24 -0700
X-Original-Message-ID: <CAMSf=W8GHOH2LQ3KFPnY1JOZQrefL0Jg+HqLAsg_NT1yt22ScQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [LML] Superfil
X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List <lml@lancaironline.net>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016e65a0254f6214804b09e9ed4

--0016e65a0254f6214804b09e9ed4
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

It's very easy to sand, and it's consistent so you don't get highs and lows
from hard/soft micro.

Dave Saylor
AirCrafters
140 Aviation Way
Watsonville, CA 95076
831-722-9141 Shop
831-750-0284 Cell


On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 1:53 PM, don Grabiel <grabiel71@gmail.com> wrote:

> Has anyone used superfil rather than the micro slurry for body work?  I've
> done the microslurry on my Lancair and am looking for a comparison and
> whether superfil is any easier to sand than micro?  Thanks.    Don G.
>

--0016e65a0254f6214804b09e9ed4
Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

It&#39;s very easy to sand, and it&#39;s consistent so you don&#39;t get hi=
ghs and lows from hard/soft micro.<br><br clear=3D"all">Dave Saylor<br>AirC=
rafters<br>140 Aviation Way<br>Watsonville, CA 95076<br>831-722-9141 Shop<b=
r>

831-750-0284 Cell<br>
<br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quote">On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 1:53 PM, don Gra=
biel <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:grabiel71@gmail.com">grabiel71=
@gmail.com</a>&gt;</span> wrote:<br><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=
=3D"margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); p=
adding-left: 1ex;">

<p>Has anyone used superfil rather than the micro slurry for body work?=C2=
=A0 I&#39;ve done the microslurry on my Lancair and am looking for a compar=
ison and whether superfil is any easier to sand than micro?=C2=A0 Thanks.=
=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 Don G.</p>



</blockquote></div><br>

--0016e65a0254f6214804b09e9ed4--