X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Tue, 01 Nov 2011 08:12:49 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from nm28.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com ([98.139.52.225] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4.2) with SMTP id 5180266 for lml@lancaironline.net; Mon, 31 Oct 2011 18:01:35 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=98.139.52.225; envelope-from=loantracy@sbcglobal.net Received: from [98.139.52.188] by nm28.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 31 Oct 2011 22:01:00 -0000 Received: from [98.139.52.140] by tm1.bullet.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 31 Oct 2011 22:01:00 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1023.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 31 Oct 2011 22:01:00 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 780577.60216.bm@omp1023.mail.ac4.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 57971 invoked from network); 31 Oct 2011 22:01:00 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=sbcglobal.net; h=DKIM-Signature:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:References:In-Reply-To:X-Apple-Yahoo-Original-Message-Folder:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:X-Mailer:From:X-Apple-Yahoo-Replied-Msgid:Subject:Date:To; b=b6X0Bje/G7q807y+P7GNV5Aa/auErF5s2qAx/uL04OEEXF+zEgyRr/e9O+kFY6baebYP2kNgtIWnmTMFlPzMr13J9eIv0T75SB2pLifrWfpvdXqagFl9He94gFuAqdeSL1c+ExOHjVYw/mPwqoMA3spxcIiKx2qyfD+S7PdIGfY= ; X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: HCXVk38VM1mf6dfpTPSEFnyj1tRzWCMCIsegIMsje0Jzktv 8AMr2LTfWiYdx.Lw3x.3OgjJx.NW7ssP6Nv9ezTii_fOvV9Grvd4u2HccDGw lcVVYaTeBsafmdiNXu1OzbVEVN6Pl6mUfshx2bgfZvwKIPwn73BtuLJX1SJI _m9PrUQadbDT95kgyCAZgkmPpO0hkeBowDrVRXjCiXGxVvXG_TBYb2Oc8gs6 mcE5th1psvpLf8wIivBPDEPZ7R.L1yB9u6Kp1uAqYXGzaUypG90UhhxqNBLO DIT.zM7od9AB9ljViGSALOLw.oRgz5FQcqinYxnYHmxzEFdSJ9f1668p6iab rSdQZOTWj47HRT_WQ7.v.aZODUxSrN5h2Gckj7.19jKFdO7RLvgLSKNvfIII - X-Yahoo-SMTP: LN43WayswBDMCJzZGaCEPUD2CdoSRuZ0PBcoiPUOut_8JSgD Received: from [10.103.67.96] (Loantracy@166.205.137.141 with xymcookie) by smtp113-mob.biz.mail.ac4.yahoo.com with SMTP; 31 Oct 2011 15:01:00 -0700 PDT References: In-Reply-To: X-Apple-Yahoo-Original-Message-Folder: Inbox Mime-Version: 1.0 (iPhone Mail 8K2) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-3-341358394 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Original-Message-Id: <746BA137-D387-4441-B2C2-2B8113D6F200@sbcglobal.net> X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (8K2) From: Jeff Pelletier X-Apple-Yahoo-Replied-Msgid: 1_86014_AE9Vk0UAATwsTq8LAAIes0DUtAE Subject: Re: [LML] Superfil X-Original-Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 15:00:52 -0700 X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List --Apple-Mail-3-341358394 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Right now working with both, sands about the same. Just do not put one ontop= of the other Jeff Pelletier=20 209 609.0233 On Oct 31, 2011, at 1:53 PM, don Grabiel wrote: > Has anyone used superfil rather than the micro slurry for body work? I've= done the microslurry on my Lancair and am looking for a comparison and whet= her superfil is any easier to sand than micro? Thanks. Don G. --Apple-Mail-3-341358394 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Type: text/html; charset=utf-8

Right now working with both, sands about the same. Just do not put one ontop of the other

Jeff Pelletier

209 609.0233

On Oct 31, 2011, at 1:53 PM, don Grabiel <grabiel71@gmail.com> wrote:

Has anyone used superfil rather than the micro slurry for body work? I've done the microslurry on my Lancair and am looking for a comparison and whether superfil is any easier to sand than micro? Thanks. Don G.

--Apple-Mail-3-341358394--