Return-Path: Received: from scratchy.itsnet.com ([192.41.96.2]) by truman.olsusa.com (Post.Office MTA v3.1.2 release (PO203-101c) ID# 0-44819U2500L250S0) with ESMTP id AAA22348 for ; Mon, 21 Sep 1998 02:12:06 -0400 Received: from scottdah (91-13.dialup.itsnet.com [192.41.91.13]) by scratchy.itsnet.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id AAA02849 for ; Mon, 21 Sep 1998 00:11:38 -0600 (MDT) From: "Scott Dahlgren" To: "___Lancair list" Subject: landing gear/ gross wt Date: Mon, 21 Sep 1998 00:14:31 -0600 Message-ID: <000301bde527$18ab32c0$825c29c0@scottdah> Importance: Normal X-Mailing-List: lancair.list@olsusa.com Mime-Version: 1.0 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> << Lancair Builders' Mail List >> <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<--->>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >> Ed Armstrong, on the gross wt of the aircraft; be careful increasing the gross wt. the aircraft wing area and horsepower will dictate takeoff distance and the factors are additive, iow, if you increase you weight by 10% you may increase your takeoff distance by 20%. also, the 9 "G's" oft quoted is "ultimate", not "use". Lancair's tech reps told me that the use load for the 320/360 is 4.5 g's @ 1685 lbs. it you go to 2000 lbs. gross, this could put you below the lowest legal limit.(3.75 "g's)and ground you. remember the entire aircraft structure and all surfaces and connections would need to go up to 2000 lbs. x 9g rating, not just the wing to be safe, and they are rated appropriately, including landing gear brakes and wheels. hope this helps, Scott Dahlgren