X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 16:47:41 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([71.74.56.122] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4c3j) with ESMTP id 4997632 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 29 May 2011 13:08:03 -0400 Received-SPF: error receiver=logan.com; client-ip=71.74.56.122; envelope-from=Wolfgang@MiCom.net Received: from hrndva-omtalb.mail.rr.com ([10.128.143.52]) by hrndva-qmta03.mail.rr.com with ESMTP id <20110529164046353.XHU3687@hrndva-qmta03.mail.rr.com> for ; Sun, 29 May 2011 16:40:46 +0000 X-Original-Return-Path: X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=ou1QuR4lBR9YeJgEH9ccYmbAdaWqVVq3lOvCKJtMpGM= c=1 sm=0 a=ttCsPuSJ-FAA:10 a=MHZY6FYWMEQOp7S43i2QIw==:17 a=_mSBpfYo9QsVgh0UFsYA:9 a=pILNOxqGKmIA:10 a=dJOOmSg6OmVcQoQ5LG8A:9 a=rbCagaOuVGBzx4AzzEEA:7 a=MHZY6FYWMEQOp7S43i2QIw==:117 X-Cloudmark-Score: 0 X-Originating-IP: 74.218.201.50 Received: from [74.218.201.50] ([74.218.201.50:1327] helo=Lobo) by hrndva-oedge02.mail.rr.com (envelope-from ) (ecelerity 2.2.3.46 r()) with ESMTP id E5/EC-04598-08672ED4; Sun, 29 May 2011 16:38:24 +0000 X-Original-Message-ID: <000801cc1e1e$cfb30590$6401a8c0@Lobo> From: "Wolfgang" X-Original-To: Subject: You got to be kidding ? ! X-Original-Date: Sun, 29 May 2011 12:38:16 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0005_01CC1DFD.486CE810" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2180 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.2180 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0005_01CC1DFD.486CE810 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable You got to be kidding ? ! I just read the AOPA article "Electronic flight displays and the courts" = in the June, 2011 issue on page 34. A Lancair 235 flew into a Cessna 172 in VFR conditions over Ohio at = about 2400 ft. Lawyers tried to sue Garmin because their flight display caused a = "distraction" that resulted in the mid-air. Yes, it was dismissed . . . thankyou ! Wolfgang ------=_NextPart_000_0005_01CC1DFD.486CE810 Content-Type: text/html; charset="Windows-1252" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
You got to be kidding ? !
 
I just read the AOPA article = "Electronic flight=20 displays and the courts" in the June, 2011 issue on page = 34.
A Lancair 235 flew into a Cessna 172 in = VFR=20 conditions over Ohio at about 2400 ft.
Lawyers tried to sue Garmin because = their flight=20 display caused a "distraction" that resulted in the = mid-air.
Yes, it was dismissed . . . thankyou = !
 
Wolfgang
 
------=_NextPart_000_0005_01CC1DFD.486CE810--