X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 12:39:33 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from elasmtp-masked.atl.sa.earthlink.net ([209.86.89.68] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4c3j) with ESMTP id 4995058 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 26 May 2011 08:34:52 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.86.89.68; envelope-from=panelmaker@earthlink.net DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=Gk+nHlqr44SjaxfGL1ocQGxDTecUe7Hbm/Oq+YVxy3kvKhqryrijYpARJVGfnpKl; h=Received:From:To:References:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:X-Mailer:In-Reply-To:Thread-Index:X-MimeOLE:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP; Received: from [209.173.71.97] (helo=COMPUTER1) by elasmtp-masked.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1QPZlY-0007ok-Np for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 26 May 2011 08:34:16 -0400 From: "Jim Nordin" X-Original-To: "'Lancair Mailing List'" References: Subject: Airworthiness inspection X-Original-Date: Thu, 26 May 2011 07:34:18 -0500 X-Original-Message-ID: <7FE7CA35E8694105AF419B2A72F92152@COMPUTER1> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 In-Reply-To: Thread-Index: AcwbmHBNMWkvXahuSmWC88o9jyxN3gACA9VA X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6090 X-ELNK-Trace: bdfc62829fd2a80cc8ad50643b1069f8239a348a220c2609f720e9b6ab81f6f9052c3ba41f516ae9667c3043c0873f7e350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 209.173.71.97 Agree on them bringing others. A good idea in my opinion. I had an experience years ago when I had my LongEZ inspected. I called the FSDO here in Houston and arranged for a time and date. I took off work for that day. I went to the airport, had the plane ready for inspection ... all day I waited. No inspector. I called them late in the day and was told the guy that was assigned to do the inspection took the day off! I'd have to wait a couple weeks to reschedule. Not a good experience. A DAR will come very soon. He makes money doing this work, and if you choose the right one he'll know how to and what to look for. It should be a learning experience for you. They should already know. If the FSDO rep doesn't know, you will not have a pleasant experience is my expectation. But I sure hope it goes well. I'm still sour grapes on the FSDO. Good luck to you Angier. Jim -----Original Message----- From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Greenbacks, UnLtd. Sent: Thursday, May 26, 2011 6:31 AM To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: [LML] Re: Airworthiness inspection I put in a call yesterday to the Boston FSDO and spoke to an Aviation Safety Inspector. I was curious about how much lead time the FAA would require for conducting an airworthiness inspection and whether they might attempt to steer me off in the direction of a DAR. The inspector called back today to say that they would like very much to do the inspection and would want about 4 - 6 weeks lead time for scheduling. And oh by the way, would I mind if they brought along three or four additional members of their safety inspection team for educational/training purposes. Apparently, it's been quite a while since any of their staff have been called upon to certify a composite homebuilt in this neck of the woods.... Of course I readily agreed, wouldn't you? :-) Angier Ames N4ZQ