X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Sun, 15 May 2011 20:48:45 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from imr-db03.mx.aol.com ([205.188.91.97] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4c3j) with ESMTP id 4984215 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sun, 15 May 2011 08:41:25 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=205.188.91.97; envelope-from=Sky2high@aol.com Received: from imo-da01.mx.aol.com (imo-da01.mx.aol.com [205.188.169.199]) by imr-db03.mx.aol.com (8.14.1/8.14.1) with ESMTP id p4FCeZdF006417; Sun, 15 May 2011 08:40:35 -0400 Received: from Sky2high@aol.com by imo-da01.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v42.9.) id q.c0b.8a2b8c68 (55736) for ; Sun, 15 May 2011 08:40:30 -0400 (EDT) Received: from magic-d17.mail.aol.com (magic-d17.mail.aol.com [172.19.155.133]) by cia-md04.mx.aol.com (v129.10) with ESMTP id MAILCIAMD043-d9b84dcfc9be316; Sun, 15 May 2011 08:40:30 -0400 From: Sky2high@aol.com X-Original-Message-ID: <13d3c.6cc0c703.3b0123be@aol.com> X-Original-Date: Sun, 15 May 2011 08:40:30 EDT Subject: Re: [LML] Re: 360 Project for sale X-Original-To: lml@lancaironline.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_13d3c.6cc0c703.3b0123be_boundary" X-Mailer: AOL 9.6 sub 130 X-AOL-IP: 24.15.17.119 X-Spam-Flag:NO X-AOL-SENDER: Sky2high@aol.com --part1_13d3c.6cc0c703.3b0123be_boundary Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Gary, If the buyer is named Phil, I will be talking to him soon. The rudder construction from scratch is not trivial - especially establishing the hinge pivots. I believe the craft has the long engine mount and that resolves CG concerns with the bigger horizontal. Building elevators for the small tail from scratch is less of a problem because of the simpler hinging. Others have replaced the small horizontal with the bigger one and did not find that so difficult. The problem might be a metal worker jumping into sophisticated glass construction with no experience. Scott Krueger 320 N92EX In a message dated 5/15/2011 7:15:39 A.M. Central Daylight Time, casey.gary@yahoo.com writes: I'm assisting someone that wants to buy a 360 project in my area. The uncertainty centers around the tail. I haven't looked at it yet, but I'm told the (small tail) elevators and rudder are missing. These parts are apparently unavailable from Lancair, so the theory is to buy a new (large) tail section, which apparently is available, and graft it to the fuselage. The buyer, who has built only metal airplanes, is nervous about the magnitude of the project and how the structural integrity is affected. I told him that while it is a significant project there is no reason to believe it couldn't be done and done well. Am I out to lunch on this? I think the price is right, or otherwise it would probably not be worth the effort.. Gary Casey ES 157 --part1_13d3c.6cc0c703.3b0123be_boundary Content-Type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Gary,
 
If the buyer is named Phil, I will be talking to him soon.  The= rudder=20 construction from scratch is not trivial - especially establishing th= e=20 hinge pivots.  I believe the craft has the long engine mount and that= =20 resolves CG concerns with the bigger horizontal.  Building elevators= for=20 the small tail from scratch is less of a problem because of the=20 simpler hinging. 
 
Others have replaced the small horizontal with the bigger one and did= not=20 find that so difficult. 
 
The problem might be a metal worker jumping into sophisticated g= lass=20 construction with no experience.
 
Scott Krueger
320 N92EX
 
In a message dated 5/15/2011 7:15:39 A.M. Central Daylight Time,=20 casey.gary@yahoo.com writes:

I'm assisting someone that wants to buy a 360 project in my=20 area.  The uncertainty centers around the tail.  I haven't loo= ked at=20 it yet, but I'm told the (small tail) elevators and rudder are missing.&= nbsp;=20 These parts are apparently unavailable from Lancair, so the theory is to= buy a=20 new (large) tail section, which apparently is available, and graft= it to=20 the fuselage.  The buyer, who has built only metal airplanes, is ne= rvous=20 about the magnitude of the project and how the structural integrity is= =20 affected.  I told him that while it is a significant project there= is no=20 reason to believe it couldn't be done and done well.  Am I out to= lunch=20 on this?  I think the price is right, or otherwise it would probabl= y not=20 be worth the effort..

Gary Casey

ES 157

--part1_13d3c.6cc0c703.3b0123be_boundary--