Mailing List lml@lancaironline.net Message #58229
From: Karen Farnsworth <farnsworth@charter.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Subject: RE: [LML] N23PH Flight time
Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 09:26:12 -0400
To: <lml@lancaironline.net>

I’m not sure too many people use lean of peak to do an engine break-in though. Also his direction of flight tends to have headwinds so it would take more fuel than the flight you referenced. He did not go at high altitude.

 

My Legacy has a TSIO-550, so I am really not up to speed on what fuel usage would be at 10,000’, doing an engine break-in rich of peak; but I suspect that that his actual range (tanks dry), under the listed parameters is his actual impact point.

 

Lynn

 


From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of edmartintx@aol.com
Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2011 03:17
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Subject: [LML] N23PH Flight time

 

          At high altitude, a stock Legacy with IO-550 should burn approximately 10.5 gallons/hour using "lean-of-peak" technique.    In this example, actual flight time was over four hours with 21 gallons remaining (66-gallon capacity).  Please see:   http://flightaware.com/live/flight/N767EM 

J. E. MARTIN

-----Original Message-----
From: Karen Farnsworth <farnsworth@charter.net>
To: lml <lml@lancaironline.net>
Sent: Tue, May 10, 2011 11:22 am
Subject: [LML] Re: N23PH Crash

 

 


From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Tom McNerney
Sent: Monday, May 09, 2011 07:33
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Subject: [LML] Re: N23PH Crash

 

Flight Aware shows 3 hours 50 min, not 3 hours 15 min.  That is a long way on 60 gallons..

 

Tom

 

If, as has been reported, the engine was new, I would think that it was still being broken in. This would lead me to thing that fuel flow would be on the high side; thus reducing range.

 

Just a thought.

 

Lynn Farnsworth

Subscribe (FEED) Subscribe (DIGEST) Subscribe (INDEX) Unsubscribe Mail to Listmaster