X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Thu, 12 May 2011 09:26:12 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mta21.charter.net ([216.33.127.81] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4c3j) with ESMTP id 4980893 for lml@lancaironline.net; Wed, 11 May 2011 17:45:29 -0400 Received-SPF: pass receiver=logan.com; client-ip=216.33.127.81; envelope-from=farnsworth@charter.net Received: from imp11 ([10.20.200.11]) by mta21.charter.net (InterMail vM.7.09.02.04 201-2219-117-106-20090629) with ESMTP id <20110511214453.CNNH11595.mta21.charter.net@imp11> for ; Wed, 11 May 2011 17:44:53 -0400 Received: from Farnsworth ([96.32.66.115]) by imp11 with smtp.charter.net id iMks1g00P2VCNeQ05Mks7v; Wed, 11 May 2011 17:44:53 -0400 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.1 cv=xIrAy5fKJ4lT2bkZ4TaeGber/3KBxgH68c1CcPCRbGc= c=1 sm=1 a=yUnIBFQkZM0A:10 a=aNhn5Dem8gkV9v2T70rsug==:17 a=Ia-xEzejAAAA:8 a=3oc9M9_CAAAA:8 a=AO0vdyU0AAAA:8 a=hOpmn2quAAAA:8 a=-uLxOpdrAAAA:8 a=mdw1Uw19zFnr9lG_qEMA:9 a=YtjHj_D9BVj_LrAdKoEA:7 a=CjuIK1q_8ugA:10 a=EzXvWhQp4_cA:10 a=U8Ie8EnqySEA:10 a=hUswqBWy9Q8A:10 a=o2GogP5kB0W56PUq:21 a=Vwvn6Ntrpl-SNsbl:21 a=SSmOFEACAAAA:8 a=ojrBAOGqE5FqZPRO64QA:9 a=1IMZPzSnlabZj8URdoYA:7 a=nDfyusUNnaUA:10 a=RLieYqdSm_2VsXDo:21 a=L1wguw8ghggVcYe7:21 a=aNhn5Dem8gkV9v2T70rsug==:117 From: "Karen Farnsworth" X-Original-To: "'Lancair Mailing List'" References: Subject: RE: [LML] N23PH Flight time X-Original-Date: Wed, 11 May 2011 17:45:04 -0400 X-Original-Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0526_01CC1003.28FE9120" X-Mailer: Microsoft Office Outlook 11 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.6090 In-Reply-To: Thread-Index: AcwQEAvGOZEp8XDqS/afJQJANu7UHAAE2tTA This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0526_01CC1003.28FE9120 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I'm not sure too many people use lean of peak to do an engine break-in though. Also his direction of flight tends to have headwinds so it would take more fuel than the flight you referenced. He did not go at high altitude. My Legacy has a TSIO-550, so I am really not up to speed on what fuel usage would be at 10,000', doing an engine break-in rich of peak; but I suspect that that his actual range (tanks dry), under the listed parameters is his actual impact point. Lynn _____ From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of edmartintx@aol.com Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2011 03:17 To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: [LML] N23PH Flight time At high altitude, a stock Legacy with IO-550 should burn approximately 10.5 gallons/hour using "lean-of-peak" technique. In this example, actual flight time was over four hours with 21 gallons remaining (66-gallon capacity). Please see: http://flightaware.com/live/flight/N767EM J. E. MARTIN -----Original Message----- From: Karen Farnsworth To: lml Sent: Tue, May 10, 2011 11:22 am Subject: [LML] Re: N23PH Crash _____ From: Lancair Mailing List [ mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Tom McNerney Sent: Monday, May 09, 2011 07:33 To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: [LML] Re: N23PH Crash Flight Aware shows 3 hours 50 min, not 3 hours 15 min. That is a long way on 60 gallons.. Tom www.N54SG.com If, as has been reported, the engine was new, I would think that it was still being broken in. This would lead me to thing that fuel flow would be on the high side; thus reducing range. Just a thought. Lynn Farnsworth ------=_NextPart_000_0526_01CC1003.28FE9120 Content-Type: text/html; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I’m not sure too many people = use lean of peak to do an engine break-in though. Also his direction of = flight tends to have headwinds so it would take more fuel than the flight you referenced. He did not go at high altitude.

 

My Legacy has a TSIO-550, so I am = really not up to speed on what fuel usage would be at 10,000’, doing an = engine break-in rich of peak; but I suspect that that his actual range (tanks = dry), under the listed parameters is his actual impact = point.

 

Lynn

 

From: = Lancair Mailing List = [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of = edmartintx@aol.com
Sent: Wednesday, May 11, = 2011 03:17
To: = lml@lancaironline.net
Subject: [LML] N23PH = Flight time

 

          At = high altitude, a stock Legacy with IO-550 should burn approximately 10.5 gallons/hour using "lean-of-peak" technique.    = In this example, actual flight time was over four hours with 21 gallons = remaining (66-gallon capacity).  Please see:   http://flightaware.com/live/flight/N767EM 

J. E. = MARTIN

-----Original Message-----
From: Karen Farnsworth <farnsworth@charter.net>
To: lml <lml@lancaironline.net>
Sent: Tue, May 10, 2011 11:22 am
Subject: [LML] Re: N23PH Crash

 

 

From: Lancair Mailing = List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] = On Behalf Of Tom McNerney
Sent: Monday, May 09, = 2011 07:33
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Subject: [LML] Re: N23PH = Crash

 

Flight Aware shows 3 hours 50 = min, not 3 hours 15 min.  That is a long way on 60 = gallons..

 

Tom

 

If, as has been reported, the = engine was new, I would think that it was still being broken in. This would lead me = to thing that fuel flow would be on the high side; thus reducing = range.

 

Just a thought.

 

Lynn Farnsworth

------=_NextPart_000_0526_01CC1003.28FE9120--