X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 10:30:27 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from elasmtp-mealy.atl.sa.earthlink.net ([209.86.89.69] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4c3j) with ESMTP id 4960483 for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 09:54:28 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=209.86.89.69; envelope-from=colyncase@earthlink.net DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=dk20050327; d=earthlink.net; b=CFBjEyg0GdMG5VIPFHEz4vZm+p6ACQK+yO9l9c2RfFBQN72Jok4k75rUP6wUdIsk; h=Received:From:Mime-Version:Content-Type:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:To:References:Message-Id:X-Mailer:X-ELNK-Trace:X-Originating-IP; Received: from [216.57.118.194] (helo=[192.168.1.102]) by elasmtp-mealy.atl.sa.earthlink.net with esmtpa (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1QFRfE-00033w-DU for lml@lancaironline.net; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 09:53:52 -0400 From: Colyn Case Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-40--725882420 Subject: Re: [LML] Re: beware, you may be searched! X-Original-Date: Thu, 28 Apr 2011 09:53:51 -0400 In-Reply-To: X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" References: X-Original-Message-Id: <4F9C8F35-8359-4342-940C-4D0D86002806@earthlink.net> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-ELNK-Trace: 63d5d3452847f8b1d6dd28457998182d7e972de0d01da940eb12ef1a6f23d572e7e33d531a456d17350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c350badd9bab72f9c X-Originating-IP: 216.57.118.194 --Apple-Mail-40--725882420 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 If you're not willing to give up on CBP why would you be willing to give = up on AOPA from whom we can withdraw our funding instantly? I think we should all bug AOPA until we find someone that answers. I = can't imagine a more apt project for them. On Apr 22, 2011, at 1:56 PM, Kent wrote: > i passed the copy to a friend and here is what he wrote back: > I just called that number, 866-247-2878. >=20 > I was handed off to Tony Martinez who said he was an aviation=20 > enforcement specialist at the Air and Marine Operations Center in = Riverside,=20 > Calif. >=20 > Based on the beeping I heard on the line, I assume the telephone call = was=20 > recorded. >=20 > He wanted to know who I was and who I represented or was "with." >=20 > I gave him my first and last name and said I'm simply a pilot in = Florida. >=20 > The Reader's Digest version of our conversation, taken from memory: >=20 > I explained I had some questions about a document -- the one in = question -- =20 > and read its title to him. >=20 > He asked where I got the document. >=20 > I said someone gave it to me. More importantly, I added, several of = the six=20 > document requirements are almost certainly incorrect, mentioning #5 = (pilot's=20 > logbook) and #6 (Form 337). I pointed out these aren't FAA = requirements. >=20 > He said Form 337s are paperwork for modifications to the aircraft and = must=20 > be in the aircraft. >=20 > I said I thought the only Form 337 that must be carried in the = aircraft was=20 > one for the installation of extra fuel tanks. >=20 > He said I should contact the FAA with my concerns. >=20 > I said this is a Dept of Homeland Security guide, not an FAA document, = so I=20 > didn't think the appropriate action was to contact the FAA. >=20 > He said he was more concerned about where I got the document. >=20 > I explained I was worried I'd be confronted by law-enforcement = officers at=20 > an airport and would run into problems because I wasn't carrying all = the=20 > documents listed in the guide. >=20 > He said this was a "guide" and "they'll be talking to us." Further=20 > back-and-forth made me realize he meant the officers would be in = real-time=20 > contact with Martinez's facility during such a confrontation. >=20 > I said this might not be the case, and I mentioned the John and Martha = King=20 > incident and one recently at a St. Louis airport, where the police = thought=20 > the aircraft was carrying a federal fugitive when in fact it contained = a=20 > lieutenant colonel in the Air Force Reserves who flew F22s. >=20 > I asked who in the DHS I should contact to get the guide corrected. He = said=20 > I could send my input to his facility. >=20 > He again mentioned his concern about my having a copy of the doc. >=20 > How do we push back against this? AOPA seems too distracted selling = wine to=20 > act on our behalf. >=20 > ---------------------------------- > ----- Original Message ----- > From: vtailjeff@aol.com > To: lml@lancaironline.net > Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2011 10:10 PM > Subject: [LML] Re: beware, you may be searched! >=20 > Here is a copy of a fax CBP sent. See if you can find the mistakes! I = am a bit surprised they believe they can detain you if you do not have = your pilot logbook onboard. LOL!!!! > =20 > Jeff > =20 >=20 >=20 > =20 >=20 >=20 > -----Original Message----- > From: Bob Rickard > To: lml@lancaironline.net > Sent: Wed, Apr 20, 2011 11:49 am > Subject: [LML] Re: beware, you may be searched! >=20 > We were able to get a copy of the fax that was sent to the local = police. The =93Tip=94 came from Customs and Border Patrol in CA. And = the local Police chief was actually apologetic because he knew it was = bogus. The tip itself is BS. They made it up. IF they had been = watching me or investigating me they would have known my wife was with = me and not some dude. That is the only part that is really a violation, = they are making up an excuse to get the locals excited, and then seeing = what they find. Another example was a guy accused of transporting = computer chips that were stolen. I can imagine them making up stories = over the coffee in the morning.=20 > =20 > How would the public react if any Fed agency routinely made up tips so = the cops would come to your house and want to search? Imagine the news = coverage. That is the same thing going on here. If they have something = on you, then absolutely go for it. But they did not in the 3 cases we = know about just at our local airport. > =20 > The lesson you derived is correct though. Know your rights, and also = know how you can help them do their job without violating your rights. = That is the best thing you can do (if innocent) while saying the least = amount possible. > =20 > Bob R > =20 > From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of = William Wilson > Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2011 7:05 AM > To: lml@lancaironline.net > Subject: [LML] Re: beware, you may be searched! > =20 > Seems pretty standard to me. They checked out a tip that proved to be = bogus. I don't see any rights violations here or anything out of the = ordinary. >=20 > The main lesson IMO is that, while there are plenty of cops who abuse = power, for the most part if you behave in a civilized manner and realize = they are just trying to do their job, most of them will treat you = fairly. That seems to be what happened here. > On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 4:13 PM, Bob Rickard = wrote: > Fellow LML=92ers > =20 > It seems inevitable that the govt will search you at some point. Just = some info on what happened to me yesterday, you can hopefully use this = to react appropriately for your situation. This is the third incident = just at our little airport in Missouri of this happening=85.. > =20 > Bob Rickard > IV-P > =20 > On 18 April, 2011, I filed IFR from KGEU to K1H0 direct, with my wife = on board. At 0845L, I departed KGEU VFR and picked up my filed IFR = clearance to K1H0 at FL210 with ABQ center. The flight was uneventful = and I cancelled IFR approximately 10 miles from K1H0 with St. Louis = Approach and landed at 1443L. Upon landing and taxi to my hanger (P3) = at Creve Coeur Airport, I was surrounded by 6 Maryland Heights Police = cars and about 10 officers. I exited the plane and was approached by = the supervisor and asked if I had any identification. I produced my = military ID (I am a LtCol in the Air Force Reserve flying F-22=92s) as = well as my driver=92s license, and asked the supervisor what the problem = was. He told me that he got a =93tip=94 from the Federal Government = that there may be a federal fugitive on board by the name of Robert = Mcrae. He wasn=92t sure of the name and asked me if I knew anyone by a = name similar to that, to which I answered =93no=94 to all. He also = stated that he was surprised to see a woman in the plane with me since = his informant said there would be two men in the plane. I inquired as = to who would give a tip like that, and he was vague. A this point my = wife exited the plane and was asked to produce her ID as well and was = questioned as to what we were doing and where we were going and where we = came from. It was apparent to the supervisor pretty quickly that my = wife and I were not federal fugitives as they ran our ID=92s, but he = asked to search the airplane anyway. I told him that I was aware of my = rights and he could not search anything without a warrant, and he was = quick to add =93or your permission=94 and =93I could have the dogs come = out=94. (side note =96 they don=92t need a warrant to have the dogs = check out your aircraft =96 if the dogs find something and indicate, = then they have probable cause to search you without a warrant. If the = dogs find nothing they cannot search your aircraft until a warrant is = issued). I told him that I would play nice, had nothing to hide, and = that my plan was to take my belongings out of the airplane and put them = in my car to go home, and I would allow him to see what I took out and = visually see inside the cockpit and baggage compartment, but I was not = allowing a search of the airplane. He agreed to this. I took my 2 = pieces of luggage out of the back and showed him the contents briefly = (not a complete search but opened up the zipper and showed clothes on = top) as well as the couple of vases we had bought in Phoenix and = lunch/sodas we had in the cockpit. They saw nothing of interest and = returned my wife=92s ID, but kept mine and made further calls. The = supervisor indicated =93I=92m on overtime, I am outta here=94 and left, = but another officer checked with =93EPIC=94 (unsure of the spelling) = which he told me was an international consortium that traded information = on travel, etc. He told me he was aware of my trip earlier this year to = Mexico and the Cayman Islands (honeymoon cruise) but there was nothing = to get me in trouble. He then returned my ID and let us go. > =20 > =20 >=20 >=20 > -- > For archives and unsub = http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html >=20 >=20 > No virus found in this message. > Checked by AVG - www.avg.com > Version: 10.0.1209 / Virus Database: 1500/3587 - Release Date: = 04/21/11 >=20 --Apple-Mail-40--725882420 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/html; charset=windows-1252 If = you're not willing to give up on CBP why would you be willing to give up = on AOPA from whom we can withdraw our funding instantly?
I think we = should all bug AOPA until we find someone that answers.    I = can't imagine a more apt project for = them.


On Apr 22, 2011, at 1:56 = PM, Kent wrote:

i passed the copy to a friend and = here is what he=20 wrote back:
I just called that number, 866-247-2878.

I was handed off to = Tony=20 Martinez <sp> who said he was an aviation
enforcement = specialist at=20 the Air and Marine Operations Center in Riverside, =
Calif.

Based on=20 the beeping I heard on the line, I assume the telephone call was=20
recorded.

He wanted to know who I was and who I represented = or was=20 "with."

I gave him my first and last name and said I'm simply a = pilot in=20 Florida.

The Reader's Digest version of our conversation, taken = from=20 memory:

I explained I had some questions about a document -- the = one in=20 question -- 
and read its title to him.

He asked where I = got the=20 document.

I said someone gave it to me. More importantly, I = added,=20 several of the six
document requirements are almost certainly = incorrect,=20 mentioning #5 (pilot's
logbook) and #6 (Form 337). I pointed out = these=20 aren't FAA requirements.

He said Form 337s are paperwork for=20 modifications to the aircraft and must
be in the aircraft.

I = said I=20 thought the only Form 337 that must be carried in the aircraft was =
one for=20 the installation of extra fuel tanks.

He said I should contact = the FAA=20 with my concerns.

I said this is a Dept of Homeland Security = guide, not=20 an FAA document, so I
didn't think the appropriate action was to = contact the=20 FAA.

He said he was more concerned about where I got the=20 document.

I explained I was worried I'd be confronted by = law-enforcement=20 officers at
an airport and would run into problems because I wasn't = carrying=20 all the
documents listed in the guide.

He said this was a = "guide" and=20 "they'll be talking to us." Further
back-and-forth made me realize = he meant=20 the officers would be in real-time
contact with Martinez's facility = during=20 such a confrontation.

I said this might not be the case, and I = mentioned=20 the John and Martha King
incident and one recently at a St. Louis = airport,=20 where the police thought
the aircraft was carrying a federal = fugitive when=20 in fact it contained a
lieutenant colonel in the Air Force Reserves = who flew=20 F22s.

I asked who in the DHS I should contact to get the guide = corrected.=20 He said
I could send my input to his facility.

He again = mentioned his=20 concern about my having a copy of the doc.

How do we push back = against=20 this? AOPA seems too distracted selling wine to
act on our=20 behalf.

----------------------------------
----- Original Message -----
Sent: Thursday, April 21, 2011 = 10:10=20 PM
Subject: [LML] Re: beware, you = may be=20 searched!

Here is a copy = of a fax=20 CBP sent. See if you can find the mistakes! I am a bit surprised they = believe=20 they can detain you if you do not have your pilot logbook onboard.=20 LOL!!!!
 
Jeff
 


 


-----Original=20 Message-----
From: Bob Rickard <r.rickard@rcginc-us.com>To:=20 lml@lancaironline.net
Sent: = Wed,=20 Apr 20, 2011 11:49 am
Subject: [LML] Re: beware, you may be=20 searched!

We were able = to get a copy=20 of the fax that was sent to the local police.  The =93Tip=94 came = from=20 Customs and Border Patrol in CA.  And the local Police chief was = actually=20 apologetic because he knew it was bogus.  The tip itself = is=20 BS.  They made it up.  IF they had been watching me or = investigating=20 me they would have known my wife was with me and not some dude.  = That is=20 the only part that is really a violation, they are making up an excuse = to get=20 the locals excited, and then seeing what they find.  Another = example was=20 a guy accused of transporting computer chips that were stolen.  I = can=20 imagine them making up stories over the coffee in the morning. =20=
 
How would the = public react=20 if any Fed agency routinely made up tips so the cops would come to = your house=20 and want to search?  Imagine the news coverage.  That is the = same=20 thing going on here.  If they have something on you, then = absolutely go=20 for it.  But they did not in the 3 cases we know about just at = our local=20 airport.
 
The lesson you = derived is=20 correct though.  Know your rights, and also know how you can help = them do=20 their job without violating your rights.  That is the best thing = you can=20 do (if innocent) while saying the least amount possible.
 
Bob=20 R
 
From: Lancair = Mailing=20 List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] = On=20 Behalf Of William Wilson
Sent: Wednesday, April 20, 2011 = 7:05=20 AM
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Subj= ect:=20 [LML] Re: beware, you may be searched!
 
Seems pretty = standard to=20 me.  They checked out a tip that proved to be bogus.  I = don't see=20 any rights violations here or anything out of the ordinary.

The = main=20 lesson IMO is that, while there are plenty of cops who abuse power, = for the=20 most part if you behave in a civilized manner and realize they are = just trying=20 to do their job, most of them will treat you fairly.  That seems = to be=20 what happened here.
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 4:13 PM, Bob Rickard = <r.rickard@rcginc-us.com>=20= wrote:
Fellow LML=92ers
 
It seems inevitable that the govt will search you at = some=20 point.  Just some info on what happened to me yesterday, you can=20= hopefully use this to react appropriately for your situation.  = This is=20 the third incident just at our little airport in Missouri of this=20 happening=85..
 
Bob Rickard
IV-P
 
On 18 April, 2011, I filed IFR from KGEU to K1H0 = direct, with=20 my wife on board.  At 0845L, I departed KGEU VFR and picked up my = filed=20 IFR clearance to K1H0 at FL210 with ABQ center.  The flight was=20= uneventful and I cancelled IFR approximately 10 miles from K1H0 with = St. Louis=20 Approach and landed at 1443L.  Upon landing and taxi to my hanger = (P3) at=20 Creve Coeur Airport, I was surrounded by 6 Maryland Heights Police = cars and=20 about 10 officers.  I exited the plane and was approached by the=20= supervisor and asked if I had any identification.  I produced my = military=20 ID (I am a LtCol in the Air Force Reserve flying F-22=92s) as well as = my=20 driver=92s license, and asked the supervisor what the problem = was.  He told=20 me that he got a =93tip=94 from the Federal Government that there may = be a federal=20 fugitive on board by the name of Robert Mcrae.  He wasn=92t sure = of the=20 name and asked me if I knew anyone by a name similar to that, to which = I=20 answered =93no=94 to all.  He also stated that he was surprised = to see a=20 woman in the plane with me since his informant said there would be two = men in=20 the plane.  I inquired as to who would give a tip like that, and = he was=20 vague.  A this point my wife exited the plane and was asked to = produce=20 her ID as well and was questioned as to what we were doing and where = we were=20 going and where we came from.   It was apparent to the = supervisor=20 pretty quickly that my wife and I were not federal fugitives as they = ran our=20 ID=92s, but he asked to search the airplane anyway.  I told him = that I was=20 aware of my rights and he could not search anything without a warrant, = and he=20 was quick to add =93or your permission=94 and =93I could have the dogs = come=20 out=94.  (side note =96 they don=92t need a warrant to have the = dogs check out=20 your aircraft =96 if the dogs find something and indicate, then they = have=20 probable cause to search you without a warrant.  If the dogs find = nothing=20 they cannot search your aircraft until a warrant is issued).  I = told him=20 that I would play nice, had nothing to hide, and that my plan was to = take my=20 belongings out of the airplane and put them in my car to go home, and = I would=20 allow him to see what I took out and visually see inside the cockpit = and=20 baggage compartment, but I was not allowing a search of the = airplane.  He=20 agreed to this. I took my 2 pieces of luggage out of the back and = showed him=20 the contents briefly (not a complete search but opened up the zipper = and=20 showed clothes on top) as well as the couple of vases we had bought in = Phoenix=20 and lunch/sodas we had in the cockpit.  They saw nothing of = interest and=20 returned my wife=92s ID, but kept mine and made further calls.  = The=20 supervisor indicated =93I=92m on overtime, I am outta here=94 and = left, but another=20 officer checked with =93EPIC=94 (unsure of the spelling) which he told = me was an=20 international consortium that traded information on travel, etc.  = He told=20 me he was aware of my trip earlier this year to Mexico and the Cayman = Islands=20 (honeymoon cruise) but there was nothing to get me in trouble.  = He then=20 returned my ID and let us go.
 
 



--
For archives and unsub=20 http://mail.= lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html



No virus found in this=20 message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 10.0.1209 / = Virus=20 Database: 1500/3587 - Release Date: 04/21/11


= --Apple-Mail-40--725882420--