X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Mon, 04 Apr 2011 02:40:47 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from nm24.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com ([98.139.91.94] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4c2) with SMTP id 4930097 for lml@lancaironline.net; Sat, 02 Apr 2011 00:37:43 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=98.139.91.94; envelope-from=randylsnarr@yahoo.com Received: from [98.139.91.63] by nm24.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 Apr 2011 04:37:08 -0000 Received: from [98.139.91.60] by tm3.bullet.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 Apr 2011 04:37:08 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1060.mail.sp2.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 02 Apr 2011 04:37:08 -0000 X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 348781.34468.bm@omp1060.mail.sp2.yahoo.com Received: (qmail 6697 invoked by uid 60001); 2 Apr 2011 04:37:07 -0000 DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=1yhX9SFBLcUWMXbM9gMlueEtD4s/U+OEeipAeS/tONEYdpiS8yNu/Lx1r0nMMIcm3/L7kADlaXWoi3T+O/1OGPvwQDMARB2W5J7IWVwXiQT5HicgVUE2PJRVvgjdODTYchJkP6D/9oCwaFQECzeY2OLPpnvk/JxxyLRXx7P5bvI=; X-Original-Message-ID: <837122.960.qm@web111403.mail.gq1.yahoo.com> X-YMail-OSG: Rn0z5XAVM1kr_OKBmuLjKyuaGjphC7bXjkhVh2EXwodQckV TcRUcGd1jUqihCOJyCDcFaf82M3KRC71LZzunBLr4cxHkfQSpaJ728g376B. sdBe3q9iKh.jTFmNduriNQe1JsYvXZUU0sOtq4WKChJFZBK8BdJagkLWJN6E lmmyp9rYHaagXMfUUz5zPmnIQyFQUcxKNmL1F6rGvjWuKg1Lt0zxhgVFVQLr iiJDEy.o0f2A1tK1bmpiRuLNllmVDE4TZoBCNheMe18Ac.sTJB6sDbUuGwXm d1fKVO7fmCzDaFUE7ZsYzu46CmNA0nLnw60rcndG5qTPcjO01ukOUaJfcp0. JrZo2m2lZX75U8D0PuEI6zbh9go5x_JQltkDdQrViwldfyaDuAl2.0ksemYQ uuXDDuh5IMqU2aQ-- Received: from [76.8.220.21] by web111403.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 21:37:07 PDT X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/12.0.2 YahooMailWebService/0.8.109.295617 X-Original-Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 21:37:07 -0700 (PDT) From: randy snarr Subject: Re: [LML] True "composite" question X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-110706020-1301719027=:960" --0-110706020-1301719027=:960 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable RV wings on a Lancair?That would be like putting a Volkswagen beetle hood o= n a Ferrari.. The ridicule you would receive from both the RV and Lancair drivers alone w= ould make you wish you were dead. You could not retreat to either camp for = safety as both groups would see=0A you as a traiter of the worst sort. Why = stop there though.. you could complete the hat trick and add a Glassair tai= l and you would have everyone pissed. April fools day I hope... Randy Snarr "Flight by machines heavier than air is unpractical and insignificant, if n= ot utterly impossible" -Simon Newcomb, 1902 --- On Fri, 4/1/11, Tim J=F8rgensen wrote: From: Tim J=F8rgensen Subject: [LML] True "composite" question To:=0A lml@lancaironline.net Date: Friday, April 1, 2011, 8:34 AM =0A=0A =0A =0A=0AHi all.=0A=A0=0AMy LNC2 is near completion and I have star= ted =0Apreparing all the paperwork necessary for the flight permit.=0ADurin= g my research I have stumbeled across the NTSB =0Awebsite and=A0made a sear= ch on "Lancair 360". For those of you who have not =0Adone that (probably m= ost!), this is HORRIFIC reading !!!=0AThere seems to be quite a large numbe= r of stall =0Arelated accidents, which leads me to believe that the airfoil= is basically =0Aunsafe. Anyway, I am not going to fly this thing as is, al= though I have had my =0Alicense for more than 20 years and have accumulated= more than=A0200 =0Ahrs.=0AI have now come across a set of RV-7 wings that = =0Asurvived a hangar collapse last winter. This airfoil seems much more for= giving, =0Aanyway, that is what my A&P says, and I am trying to come up wit= h a way to =0Ainstall them on my otherwise finished airframe. I will, of co= urse, have to keep =0Athe stub wings and make them fit the slightly larger = RV wing but, apart from =0Athat, would I be in for at lot work? Has anyone = done this before? Any advice =0Ataken!=0A=A0=0ARegards=0ATim Jorgensen=0ALa= ncair 360, was 95% done, now back to maybe =0A60%.....=A0=0A=A0=A0 --0-110706020-1301719027=:960 Content-Type: text/html; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

RV wings on a Lancair?That= would be like putting a Volkswagen beetle hood on a Ferrari..

The r= idicule you would receive from both the RV and Lancair drivers alone would = make you wish you were dead. You could not retreat to either camp for safet= y as both groups would see=0A you as a traiter of the worst sort. Why stop = there though.. you could complete the hat trick and add a Glassair tail and= you would have everyone pissed.

April fools day I hope...

Randy Snarr

"Flight by machine= s heavier than air is unpractical and insignificant, if not utterly impossi= ble"
-Simon Newcomb, 1902

--- On Fri, 4/1/11, Tim J=F8r= gensen <tj@yacht-pool.dk> wrote:

From: Tim J=F8rgensen <tj@yacht-pool.dk>
Subject: [LML] Tru= e "composite" question
To:=0A lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Friday, Apr= il 1, 2011, 8:34 AM

=0A=0A =0A =0A