X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 16:27:52 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from mailgate.tru.ca ([192.146.156.111] verified) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4c2) with ESMTP id 4929693 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 14:18:41 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=192.146.156.111; envelope-from=DBaleshta@tru.ca Received: from mailgate.tru.ca (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mailgate (Postfix) with SMTP id A810D3248F2 for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2011 11:18:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Groupwise4.tru.ca (groupwise4.tru.ca [192.146.156.118]) by mailgate.tru.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6DC81324A03 for ; Fri, 1 Apr 2011 11:18:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: from TRUDOM4-MTA by Groupwise4.tru.ca with Novell_GroupWise; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 11:18:04 -0700 X-Original-Message-Id: <4D95B45F.AD08.00B3.0@tru.ca> X-Mailer: Novell GroupWise Internet Agent 7.0.4 X-Original-Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 11:17:54 -0700 From: "Doug Baleshta" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" Subject: [LML] Re: True "composite" question References: In-Reply-To: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="=__Part674BB1C2.0__=" X-PMX-Version: 5.5.5.374460, Antispam-Engine: 2.7.1.369594, Antispam-Data: 2011.4.1.180623 X-PerlMx-Spam: Gauge=X, Probability=10%, Report=' TO_IN_SUBJECT 0.5, HTML_NO_HTTP 0.1, BODYTEXTH_SIZE_10000_LESS 0, BODYTEXTP_SIZE_3000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_2000_2999 0, BODY_SIZE_5000_LESS 0, BODY_SIZE_7000_LESS 0, DATE_TZ_NA 0, __CT 0, __CTYPE_HAS_BOUNDARY 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART 0, __CTYPE_MULTIPART_ALT 0, __HAS_HTML 0, __HAS_MSGID 0, __HAS_X_MAILER 0, __MIME_HTML 0, __MIME_VERSION 0, __SANE_MSGID 0, __TAG_EXISTS_HTML 0, __TO_MALFORMED_2 0, __URI_NO_PATH 0, __URI_NO_WWW 0' This is a MIME message. If you are reading this text, you may want to consider changing to a mail reader or gateway that understands how to properly handle MIME multipart messages. --=__Part674BB1C2.0__= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=Windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Wow, it is April 1st isn't it ;-) D. >>> Guy Buchanan 01/04/2011 11:13 am >>> On 4/1/2011 7:34 AM, Tim Jørgensen wrote: I have now come across a set of RV-7 wings that survived a hangar collapse last winter. This airfoil seems much more forgiving, anyway, that is what my A&P says, and I am trying to come up with a way to install them on my otherwise finished airframe. I will, of course, have to keep the stub wings and make them fit the slightly larger RV wing but, apart from that, would I be in for at lot work? Has anyone done this before? Any advice taken! The only thing funnier than this question would be to actually see it accomplished; even in Photoshop. Good one Tim. Guy Buchanan Ramona, CA Kitfox IV-1200 / 592-C / Warp 3cs / 500 hrs. and grounded --=__Part674BB1C2.0__= Content-Type: text/html; charset=Windows-1252 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Description: HTML

Wow, it is April 1st isn't it ;-)

D.

>>> Guy Buchanan <gebuchanan@cox.net> = 01/04/2011 11:13 am >>>
On 4/1/2011 7:34 AM, Tim J=F8rgensen = wrote:

I have now come across a set of RV-7 = wings that survived a hangar collapse last winter. This airfoil seems much = more forgiving, anyway, that is what my A&P says, and I am trying to = come up with a way to install them on my otherwise finished airframe. I = will, of course, have to keep the stub wings and make them fit the = slightly larger RV wing but, apart from that, would I be in for at lot = work? Has anyone done this before? Any advice taken!

The only thing funnier than this question would be to actually see = it accomplished; even in Photoshop. Good one Tim.

Guy Buchanan
Ra= mona, CA
Kitfox IV-1200 / 592-C / Warp 3cs / 500 hrs. and grounded

--=__Part674BB1C2.0__=--