X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com Return-Path: Sender: To: lml@lancaironline.net Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 16:27:52 -0400 Message-ID: X-Original-Return-Path: Received: from [69.146.254.20] (HELO crmtest.arilabs.net) by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4c2) with ESMTP id 4929723 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 14:47:20 -0400 Received-SPF: none receiver=logan.com; client-ip=69.146.254.20; envelope-from=kevin@arilabs.net Content-class: urn:content-classes:message MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CBF09D.26440009" Subject: RE: [LML] Re: True "composite" question X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5.6944.0 X-Original-Date: Fri, 1 Apr 2011 12:46:38 -0600 X-Original-Message-ID: <3E1C96B95693C640B0AC2F59D2500F3B0FE2CD@crmtest.arilabs.net> X-MS-Has-Attach: X-MS-TNEF-Correlator: Thread-Topic: [LML] Re: True "composite" question Thread-Index: AcvwmIdzdOgMZk0ITXmWYciqWs4JRwABINTw From: "Kevin Stallard" X-Original-To: "Lancair Mailing List" This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------_=_NextPart_001_01CBF09D.26440009 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Okay...I feel stupid. I bought that one hook line and sinker. Good one = Tim.... =20 ________________________________ From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of = Kevin Stallard Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 12:13 PM To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: [LML] Re: True "composite" question =20 There are many 360 drivers out there that don't have problems. Just = don't fly it slow... You know, I think it is good to read that stuff, = but not for conclusions whether or not something is 'safe'. I mean, how = do you define safe? If you don't like 90 or 100 knot approaches, well, = then it isn't for you, but I just think that if you handle it right, = you'll be fine. It isn't a Cessna or a piper, but that doesn't mean it = isn't safe... =20 Just my opinion... =20 Kevin =20 ________________________________ From: Lancair Mailing List [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of = Tim J=F8rgensen Sent: Friday, April 01, 2011 8:35 AM To: lml@lancaironline.net Subject: [LML] True "composite" question =20 Hi all. =20 My LNC2 is near completion and I have started preparing all the = paperwork necessary for the flight permit. During my research I have stumbeled across the NTSB website and made a = search on "Lancair 360". For those of you who have not done that = (probably most!), this is HORRIFIC reading !!! There seems to be quite a large number of stall related accidents, which = leads me to believe that the airfoil is basically unsafe. Anyway, I am = not going to fly this thing as is, although I have had my license for = more than 20 years and have accumulated more than 200 hrs. I have now come across a set of RV-7 wings that survived a hangar = collapse last winter. This airfoil seems much more forgiving, anyway, = that is what my A&P says, and I am trying to come up with a way to = install them on my otherwise finished airframe. I will, of course, have = to keep the stub wings and make them fit the slightly larger RV wing = but, apart from that, would I be in for at lot work? Has anyone done = this before? Any advice taken! =20 Regards Tim Jorgensen Lancair 360, was 95% done, now back to maybe 60%.....=20 =20 ------_=_NextPart_001_01CBF09D.26440009 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Okay…I feel stupid.=A0 I bought that one hook line and = sinker.=A0 Good one Tim….

 

From: = Lancair Mailing List = [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Kevin Stallard
Sent: Friday, April 01, = 2011 12:13 PM
To: = lml@lancaironline.net
Subject: [LML] Re: True "composite" question

 

There are many 360 drivers out = there that don’t have problems.  Just don’t fly it = slow…  You know, I think it is good to read that stuff, but not for conclusions = whether or not something is ‘safe’.  I mean, how do you define safe?  If you don’t like 90 or 100 knot approaches, well, = then it isn’t for you, but I just think that if you handle it right, = you’ll be fine.  It isn’t a Cessna or a piper, but that = doesn’t mean it isn’t safe…

 

Just my = opinion…

 

Kevin

 

From: = Lancair Mailing List = [mailto:lml@lancaironline.net] On Behalf Of Tim J=F8rgensen
Sent: Friday, April 01, = 2011 8:35 AM
To: = lml@lancaironline.net
Subject: [LML] True "composite" question

 

Hi all.

 

My LNC2 is near completion and I have started = preparing all the paperwork necessary for the flight = permit.

During my research I have stumbeled across the NTSB = website and made a search on "Lancair 360". For those of you who = have not done that (probably most!), this is HORRIFIC reading = !!!

There seems to be quite a large number of stall = related accidents, which leads me to believe that the airfoil is basically = unsafe. Anyway, I am not going to fly this thing as is, although I have had my = license for more than 20 years and have accumulated more than 200 = hrs.

I have now come across a set of RV-7 wings that = survived a hangar collapse last winter. This airfoil seems much more forgiving, = anyway, that is what my A&P says, and I am trying to come up with a way to = install them on my otherwise finished airframe. I will, of course, have to keep = the stub wings and make them fit the slightly larger RV wing but, apart from = that, would I be in for at lot work? Has anyone done this before? Any advice = taken!

 

Regards

Tim Jorgensen

Lancair 360, was 95% done, now back to maybe = 60%..... 

  

------_=_NextPart_001_01CBF09D.26440009--