X-Virus-Scanned: clean according to Sophos on Logan.com
Return-Path: <marv@lancaironline.net>
Sender: <marv@lancaironline.net>
To:  lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Fri, 01 Apr 2011 08:02:10 -0400
Message-ID: <redirect-4929166@logan.com>
X-Original-Return-Path: <randylsnarr@yahoo.com>
Received: from nm14.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com ([98.138.90.77] verified)
  by logan.com (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 5.4c2)
  with SMTP id 4928842 for lml@lancaironline.net; Fri, 01 Apr 2011 01:14:32 -0400
Received-SPF: none
 receiver=logan.com; client-ip=98.138.90.77; envelope-from=randylsnarr@yahoo.com
Received: from [98.138.90.56] by nm14.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 01 Apr 2011 05:13:56 -0000
Received: from [98.138.89.166] by tm9.bullet.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 01 Apr 2011 05:13:56 -0000
Received: from [127.0.0.1] by omp1022.mail.ne1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 01 Apr 2011 05:13:56 -0000
X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3
X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 882233.4856.bm@omp1022.mail.ne1.yahoo.com
Received: (qmail 37552 invoked by uid 60001); 1 Apr 2011 05:13:56 -0000
DomainKey-Signature:a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
  s=s1024; d=yahoo.com;
  h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type;
  b=M8D4QFNMLu2auWb5zVBtrF7x1mz3Dd7ILtf+iy7K5PkHusebt1snQphGvjEMfZqEls2rlmZ+0sD7B1ZO7MQ6n2SGkUg8DDOAv+EdqphOsTHj2Xwy1vdtb4g39D+Neu/4Dkb2o0cJ5HtkOeqH8KbJ7QyIYqzITEXzPtzjhu6N5aw=;
X-Original-Message-ID: <183981.23749.qm@web111406.mail.gq1.yahoo.com>
X-YMail-OSG: MRXKgpYVM1lY6qWw0zd5qRLPLq2FDAG7UV04DpYvOdCDV.v
 J4xniemcADyJGA6e67VG7QaaZuRRpj8dtPiNoZcfrkmbrCuToOilrdojK13R
 f2yaqzI7G6MUx3JYG7M2BOg2IGPievwdPZvM6AAFdIFYRVGxiIrQgaILnOuF
 dh4d7fA9GlWKPxrpG.XRvfDO8vquQRb5K3hXKXIH_1uHsB.RHPnsuhJEkzD1
 wmwLJmr6oy1m60Ppt9pq5PKWf4QrjpPLSQ6N23GLAlDuXllzmp7gUq4LFBwA
 OxeqHc.zS5Kl40JKnvYCBhSL86Ah8Eni47I9Q3y7MDJXdyx__frBe_l2pdbW
 .y7VRyUny4cyr30kHFP36kkzp1IURuAolao.r4AXDUtrGSIUaV9ENOZUlA7v
 ZYnho2F1ILNstfA--
Received: from [76.8.220.21] by web111406.mail.gq1.yahoo.com via HTTP; Thu, 31 Mar 2011 22:13:56 PDT
X-Mailer: YahooMailClassic/12.0.2 YahooMailWebService/0.8.109.295617
X-Original-Date: Thu, 31 Mar 2011 22:13:56 -0700 (PDT)
From: randy snarr <randylsnarr@yahoo.com>
Subject: Re: [LML] Re: Finishing Elevator Question you guys make me laugh...
X-Original-To: Lancair Mailing List <lml@lancaironline.net>
In-Reply-To: <list-4925916@logan.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0-1547493083-1301634836=:23749"

--0-1547493083-1301634836=:23749
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii

You guys make me laugh...
I think I spent more time reading these posts about the finishing of the tail feathers than I spent doing the work of finishing the tail feathers on my plane..
lol..
The judges at OSH in 09 didn't mind at all...
I had to say it...
Keep after it 
Hope to see you all at a fly in soon...
Randy Snarr
N694RS
"Flight by machines heavier than air is unpractical and insignificant, if not utterly impossible"
-Simon Newcomb, 1902

--- On Tue, 3/29/11, Greenbacks, UnLtd. <N4ZQ@VERIZON.NET> wrote:

From: Greenbacks, UnLtd. <N4ZQ@VERIZON.NET>
Subject: [LML] Re: Finishing Elevator Question
To: lml@lancaironline.net
Date: Tuesday, March 29, 2011, 8:14 AM

According to Stan, the Legacy manual specifies a concave shape for the elevator surface. The 320/360 calls for straight.
For those of us who may be aerodynamically challenged, what is the benefit of one shape vs the other? Are all the Legacy control surfaces concave? What about the IV and Evolution?

Angier Ames
N4ZQ

ps..had to perform a much needed upgrade to my cockpit yesterday, an accessory power source for my iPad!
--
For archives and unsub http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html

--0-1547493083-1301634836=:23749
Content-Type: text/html; charset=us-ascii

<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0" border="0" ><tr><td valign="top" style="font: inherit;">You guys make me laugh...<br>I think I spent more time reading these posts about the finishing of the tail feathers than I spent doing the work of finishing the tail feathers on my plane..<br>lol..<br>The judges at OSH in 09 didn't mind at all...<br>I had to say it...<br>Keep after it <br>Hope to see you all at a fly in soon...<br>Randy Snarr<br>N694RS<br><span style="font-style: italic;">"Flight by machines heavier than air is unpractical and insignificant, if not utterly impossible"</span><br>-Simon Newcomb, 1902<br><br>--- On <b>Tue, 3/29/11, Greenbacks, UnLtd. <i>&lt;N4ZQ@VERIZON.NET&gt;</i></b> wrote:<br><blockquote style="border-left: 2px solid rgb(16, 16, 255); margin-left: 5px; padding-left: 5px;"><br>From: Greenbacks, UnLtd. &lt;N4ZQ@VERIZON.NET&gt;<br>Subject: [LML] Re: Finishing Elevator Question<br>To: lml@lancaironline.net<br>Date: Tuesday, March
 29, 2011, 8:14 AM<br><br><div class="plainMail">According to Stan, the Legacy manual specifies a concave shape for the elevator surface. The 320/360 calls for straight.<br>For those of us who may be aerodynamically challenged, what is the benefit of one shape vs the other? Are all the Legacy control surfaces concave? What about the IV and Evolution?<br><br>Angier Ames<br>N4ZQ<br><br>ps..had to perform a much needed upgrade to my cockpit yesterday, an accessory power source for my iPad!<br>--<br>For archives and unsub <a href="http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html" target="_blank">http://mail.lancaironline.net:81/lists/lml/List.html</a><br></div></blockquote></td></tr></table>
--0-1547493083-1301634836=:23749--